The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Sohom Dattatalk 17:39, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
Overall: The article is new enough and long enough. Source verifies hook. No copyvio detected. Both hooks are interesting and cited. QPQ done. Should probably cleanup the tag on the article first though. Otherwise, both hooks are good to go. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 23:05, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
WikiOriginal-9, AndyGordon, We cannot run this without first resolving the three orange tags on the top of the page (see WP:DYKTAG). Sohom (talk) 13:36, 13 March 2025 (UTC)
The article is new enough and long enough. Source verifies hook. No copyvio detected. Both hooks are interesting and cited. QPQ done. Should probably cleanup the tag on the article first though. Otherwise, both hooks are good to go. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 23:05, 6 March 2025 (UTC)