Jump to content

Template:AfC comment/testcases

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Test1
{{AfC comment|comment content – [[User:Wbm1058|wbm1058]] ([[User talk:Wbm1058|talk]]) 02:15, 2 February 2021 (UTC)}}

{{AfC comment}}

  • Comment: comment content – wbm1058 (talk) 02:15, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

{{AfC comment/sandbox}}

  • Comment: comment content – wbm1058 (talk) 02:15, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
Test2 – Report error when parameter 1 is defined but null
{{AfC comment|}}

{{AfC comment}}

  • Comment: Error: There was no comment detected! Please follow the instructions at Template:AfC comment.

{{AfC comment/sandbox}}

  • Comment: Error: There was no comment detected! Please follow the instructions at Template:AfC comment.
Test3 – Multi paragraph
{{AfC comment|This is a multi-paragraph comment. It is long enough to appear on multiple lines. It simulates what happens when a reviewer leaves a comment with several paragraphs.

This is a second paragraph for the multi-paragraph comment. It is also long enough that it should wrap to a second line on most displays. 

This is a third, shorter, paragraph.
}}

{{AfC comment}}

  • Comment: This is a multi-paragraph comment. It is long enough to appear on multiple lines. It simulates what happens when a reviewer leaves a comment with several paragraphs.
    This is a second paragraph for the multi-paragraph comment. It is also long enough that it should wrap to a second line on most displays.
    This is a third, shorter, paragraph.

{{AfC comment/sandbox}}

  • Comment: This is a multi-paragraph comment. It is long enough to appear on multiple lines. It simulates what happens when a reviewer leaves a comment with several paragraphs.
    This is a second paragraph for the multi-paragraph comment. It is also long enough that it should wrap to a second line on most displays.
    This is a third, shorter, paragraph.
Test4 – Varying numbers of spaces per paragraph
{{AfC comment|This is a multi-paragraph comment. It is long enough to appear on multiple lines. It simulates what happens when a reviewer leaves a comment with several paragraphs.

This is a second paragraph for the multi-paragraph comment. It is also long enough that it should wrap to a second line on most displays. It has two newlines before it.
This is a third, shorter, paragraph.  It only has one newline before it.

This paragraph has two.


The paragraph has three.



This paragraph has four.
}}

{{AfC comment}}

  • Comment: This is a multi-paragraph comment. It is long enough to appear on multiple lines. It simulates what happens when a reviewer leaves a comment with several paragraphs.
    This is a second paragraph for the multi-paragraph comment. It is also long enough that it should wrap to a second line on most displays. It has two newlines before it.
    This is a third, shorter, paragraph. It only has one newline before it.
    This paragraph has two.
    The paragraph has three.
    This paragraph has four.

{{AfC comment/sandbox}}

  • Comment: This is a multi-paragraph comment. It is long enough to appear on multiple lines. It simulates what happens when a reviewer leaves a comment with several paragraphs.
    This is a second paragraph for the multi-paragraph comment. It is also long enough that it should wrap to a second line on most displays. It has two newlines before it.
    This is a third, shorter, paragraph. It only has one newline before it.
    This paragraph has two.
    The paragraph has three.
    This paragraph has four.
Test5 – Embedded list
{{AfC comment|This test has an embedded, indented list: 
::#List item #1
::#List item #2
::#List item #3}}

{{AfC comment}}

  • Comment: This test has an embedded, indented list:
    ::#List item #1
    ::#List item #2
    ::#List item #3

{{AfC comment/sandbox}}

  • Comment: This test has an embedded, indented list:
    ::#List item #1
    ::#List item #2
    ::#List item #3

{{Test case|1={{__TEMPLATENAME__|1=

Source assessment table prepared by User:LittlePuppers
Source Independent? Reliable? Significant coverage? Count source toward GNG?
No personal blog of creator No Yes No
Yes No automatically generated for any website No
Yes Yes probably Yes Yes
No No
No No
Yes No probably not, appears to be a blog Yes No
Yes volunteer-written but at least somewhat official seems to be mostly just documentation that "we use this thing" ? Unknown
Yes No automatically generated No
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.