Talk:Voyager program

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Voyager program article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 3 months

Voyager program was nominated as a Natural sciences good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (August 12, 2024, reviewed version). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

Astronomy: Solar System Mid‑importance

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Solar System task force (assessed as High-importance).

Spaceflight Mid‑importance

	Spaceflight portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merge proposal

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result of this discussion was merge . Викидим (talk) 04:35, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I propose to merge Mariner Jupiter-Saturn into this article. Same team, same goal, same spacecrafts. It is just a new name, we traditionally do not create separate articles in cases of such clear continuity. Size of this article is within acceptable limits. Викидим (talk) 03:34, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support: MJS article explains nothing but a brief period of its name and how it had to be changed. Pretty much all of this content can be moved to Voyager article's history section. A redirect can be made from the MJS towards Voyager. Footy2000♡; 05:09, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support, it belongs to the History section. Artem.G (talk) 06:23, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

GA Review

Unsuccessful. Z1720 (talk) 01:48, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Voyager program/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: The Herald (talk · contribs) 09:16, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Z1720 (talk · contribs) 01:48, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, I am going to have to quick-fail this article, due to a number of concerns that I have:

There are numerous uncited statements, including entire paragraphs. This is especially evident in the "Computers and data processing" and "Scientific instruments" sections. Also, the "Spacecraft design" talks about the diagram, but this information needs to be cited with inline citations, instead of referring to the image.
There are many one-sentence paragraphs, which are not recommended for articles, as too many of them are difficult to read. Instead, merge this information with other paragraphs.
I suggest using the sources listed in "Further reading", or remove them altogether.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ping me or message me on my talk page. I will run the bot to fail this GAN momentarily. Z1720 (talk) 01:48, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Neither the JST nor the JSX acronyms, used in the article, are defined

The title says it all, I believe. ~2025-36749-32 (talk) 06:29, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]