Talk:Vision-language-action model

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Artificial Intelligence, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Artificial intelligence on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Artificial IntelligenceWikipedia:WikiProject Artificial IntelligenceTemplate:WikiProject Artificial IntelligenceArtificial Intelligence

Computing

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Linguistics

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Robotics

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Robotics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Robotics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RoboticsWikipedia:WikiProject RoboticsTemplate:WikiProject RoboticsRobotics
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Technology

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology

This article was the subject of an educational assignment in July 2025. Further details are available on the course page.

Reviewer 1

- The first phrase of the paragraph is sometimes isolated and without reference. Personally, I would add it for clarity

- There are topics or concepts which are referenced in earlier paragraphs but defined in later paragraphs. I would define them before referencing them (example: Helix and Groot N1)

- This is a highly specialized article with several technical terms for which no wiki page is available. It could be interesting to produce a "twin" article for beginners, taking the time to explain less concepts but more in detail.

Many congratulations for the deep technical expertise and competence. Jormun32 (talk) 13:25, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer 2

The article is well-structured and written. It is pretty clear the expertise on the subject. There are many technical terms but overall the page is informative even if you are not an expert in the field. The article is well-supported by an adequate number of references. --Cerio3+ (talk) 14:01, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Review - Wikipedia:GLAM/PoliMi/2025

As someone who is not an expert in this field, I found the article informative and a helpful introduction to the topic. The structure is clear and the references are useful for further reading. However, some parts could benefit from additional clarification or simplified explanations to make the content more accessible to a broader audience. Notmethax (talk) 14:05, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Review 3

Very well structured, the pictures are helpful for understanding the content. --~~~~ 去冰 (talk) 14:12, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from New Page Review process

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Since this page was expanded as part of a class NPP is relevant.

Ldm1954 (talk) 02:45, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Ldm1954 What class? Cielquiparle (talk) 07:27, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Is that a policy? I have never heard of it. I would much prefer to have members of the relevant WikiProjects review the article. You could reach out to them individually if you like. Cielquiparle (talk) 07:40, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]