Talk:Vertiginous question
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
How the hell did this survive scrutiny
[edit]Benj Hallies Vertiginous Question? srsly? How the hell did this not get flagged as all of the violations of site norms it is, not to mention the utter worthlessness of it taken to a professional, nay professorial level.
75.246.203.220 (talk) 11:36, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
- yeah this article really needs more editing, but this question is completely valid and might be even harder to answer than the hard problem 216.232.123.170 (talk) 06:15, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
- whoops just noticed the article already says that 216.232.123.170 (talk) 06:18, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
- The Japanese version appears to be a more sophisticated article and should have at least some if its contents edited and added to the English version 216.232.123.170 (talk) 06:32, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
Categories:
- Stub-Class Philosophy articles
- Low-importance Philosophy articles
- Stub-Class philosophy of mind articles
- Low-importance philosophy of mind articles
- Philosophy of mind task force articles
- Stub-Class Contemporary philosophy articles
- Low-importance Contemporary philosophy articles
- Contemporary philosophy task force articles