Talk:Trolley problem

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Trolley problem article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives (index): 1: 3 months

Psychology Mid‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Philosophy: Ethics / Contemporary Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Ethics
	Contemporary philosophy

Criticism section

I am deleting a portion because I honestly do not know why anyone thought two individuals with no notable contributions to or credentials in philosophy writing in their own political magazine would warrant that space. There's no evidence that the article has been impactful in discussions about the subject or that it is representative of a large percentage of people's opinions. A random person thinking that the article is insightful is not grounds for inclusion; there needs to be some form of notability. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.194.153.220 (talk) 01:53, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A third solution that kills nobody

I can't remember where I came across this solution. It was a case of an actual railroader who suggested it: Wait until the trolley's front truck has passed the points of the switch rods and then quickly operate the switch. This will cause a derailment because the front truck goes one way and the rear truck goes the other way. If there's enough space between the switch and the people who would be killed, nobody will die. The source I found made no mention of what happens to the people on the trolley. -- Frotz(talk) 01:58, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

the trolley problem in popular culture

There have been numerous mentiones of the trolley problem In popular culture, and i think the article should mention that. Natanoli (talk) 12:57, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Brakes

Tge tram driver has eyes and the brakes. He will stop the tram, whichever way it goes. ~2025-31640-11 (talk) 13:55, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]