Talk:Transcript (law)
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
"Less formal courts" - many courts worldwide use digital recording technology rather than court reporters for formal hearings - edited to reflect this. LPBearian 00:21, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
Is legal purpose different from other purposes?
[edit]A transcript as a written record of spoken language is not limited to legal usage. Depending on the circumstances, sometimes after interviews the academic researchers or journalists also produce a written record of the exact words said by the interviewees. I think we can include such usage in this article as well.--Quest for Truth (talk) 17:31, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
External reference issues
[edit]Citation #5 is just the top of the sales funnel for a paid transcription service. It's cited for a single sentence. The existing citations #4 and #6 already support the claim made.
Citation #8 to weneedaspeech.com, their entire domain refers to an "under construction" page and has since at least Feb 2025. 2601:98A:C01:D9A0:8C0D:7FC4:1149:B (talk) 15:34, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
"ProTEXT" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]
The redirect ProTEXT has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 December 4 § ProTEXT until a consensus is reached. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 14:29, 4 December 2025 (UTC)