Talk:Training to failure
![]() | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
![]() | This article contains broken links to one or more target anchors:
The anchors may have been removed, renamed, or are no longer valid. Please fix them by following the link above, checking the page history of the target pages, or updating the links. Remove this template after the problem is fixed | Report an error |
Current research may contradict article
[edit]This page is really poorly supported by research. For example https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26666744 states the complete opposite. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 185.57.104.135 (talk) 11:16, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
- The article is poorly sourced, and would benefit from the academic research findings found here, here and here. 14.2.198.139 (talk) 10:11, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
- Note that the paper you're citing:
"Non-failure training resulted in a 0.6–1.3% greater strength increase than failure training." (original)
That being said, I do agree the article could use with some more studies and clearer language. Cheers — Avelludo (Talk / Contribs / Log) 03:38, 23 August 2023 (UTC)"No significant strength increases were found for failure training versus non-failure training (ES = 0.05, p = 0.73)" (corrected)
has an issued correction: In it, the authors rewrite some statements to indicate there was no significant difference between failure and non-failure training. For example, in the abstract:
Wiki Education assignment: Introduction to Digital Humanities
[edit] This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 24 September 2023 and 15 December 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Mtpride07 (article contribs).
— Assignment last updated by Mtpride07 (talk) 23:38, 30 November 2023 (UTC)