Talk:Thiruvithamcode

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Thiruvithamcode article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities

India: Tamil Nadu / Geography Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Tamil Nadu (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Geography of India (assessed as Low-importance).

Suggested merge

From what I can understand, it appears that this article and Thiruvithankodu refer to the same city. Not sure which is the preferred spelling. ~Eliz81 ^(C) 12:22, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

=

THIRUVITHANCODE is the correct spelling for this place as per the post office stamp. Also it is the commonly used spelling by the government and other local institutions.

Malik Mohamed , A native of Thiruvithancode

=

I have performed the suggested merge. However, as i do not have right-to-left script installed currently, i'm not sure if the first language link copied correctly. All i see are question marks. So someone should probably check that. Quickmythril (talk) 03:18, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

=