Talk:Strong AI technology
Intended as a summary of the technological aspects, and how strong AI could be produced/what it would be like —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Crippled Sloth (talk • contribs) .
Ive now realised that there is another article called strong AI. Looking at it, it seems that the other is about the philosophy whilst the one i started is concerned with the technology involved, and a summary of existing futurist predictions. Ill change the title to reflect this if someone shows me how. Btw, if a technological singularity article is ok, how come this is too speculative? Crippled Sloth 15:08, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
- You can rename a page by following the "Move this page" link from the edit page.
- There's nothing wrong with discussing published predictions of well-known authors, provided that they are treated as such; the technological singularity article does precisely that. It's a very subtle (but important!) distinction: the predictions and beliefs themselves should be the focus, rather than the things they predict. —
donhalcon〒 17:03, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
Im too new to move it. Someone please move it to Strong AI technologyCrippled Sloth 17:48, 27 February 2006 (UTC)