Talk:Stochastic volatility jump models

	Mathematics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-priority on the project's priority scale.

Finance & Investment Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Statistics Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Statistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of statistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.StatisticsWikipedia:WikiProject StatisticsTemplate:WikiProject StatisticsStatistics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Reviewer 1

Hi,

You have written an amazing article but i have following suggestions (which i can't change myself since you have better idea as an author):

In Fundamental Hypotheses section, "Cox–Ingersoll–Ross process" page which you cited doesn't exist. If it exists with some other name, you can cite that.
Ref [4] and [5] are same. If it is by mistake then we can remove one but if [5] is different, you can cite the actual source.

Hassaan72 (talk) 13:43, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Review 2

Great article, really! To a non-expert, such as myself, it seems exhaustive and very clear.

I also wanted to point out the same references-related issues as Reviewer 1, thus I point you there.

In section "Mathematical formulation", second-to-last paragraph I suggest either explaining or finding an hyperlink for "long-term uncertainty", or even "uncertainty" in general.

You are lacking a "See also", "Further readings" and "External links" sections. In fact, I expected to see some affine topics in the "see also", like maybe a pointer to Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. EMJzero (talk) 14:30, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]