Talk:Semisimple representation/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions about Semisimple representation. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Semisimple representation

No need to consider this furhter unless the article is returned to draft, or brought to AFD and a return to draft is sugested DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 03:55, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Any editor nominating this for Deletion, I attempted to have this page deleted under MFD and the author of the page moved it to mainspace during the MFD. Per accepted convention I withdrew the MFD, however I would like to firmly register that I oppose any return to Draftspace without the stick of CSD:G13 being in place including a no REFUND allowed rule. Either the page survives in mainspace, it is returned to Draft namespace and it stays of the G13 rail, or it gets deleted without any allowance for WP:REFUND. Hasteur (talk) 01:09, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

No other editor suggested such a restriction on this page, and it cannot therefore be considered to have been imposed by consensus. I do not see any reason why this should be returned to draft status, but if it should be, it will be in precisely the same position as any other draft. The availability of refund is a general policy and cannot be foreclosed in advance by a singel editor, although an admin asked for a future REFUND on this page might consider this history. DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 03:39, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Merge proposal

@TakuyaMurata: What is your justification for merging Isotypic component to this article? –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 01:35, 11 July 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for asking. The rationale for the merger proposal is that the article isotypic component concerns about a particular instance of an isotypic component. This article also discusses an isotypic component but in a more general context and merging the former into this one should be helpful to the readers. —- Taku (talk) 05:09, 11 July 2024 (UTC)

I haven't taken my own look, but I guess that is okay. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 06:12, 11 July 2024 (UTC)