Talk:Secret Service Operator 5

This article came from my original collection of Operator 5 pulps of which I know only have reprints I made. Other information, the gaps in the index, is what I accrued while a collector.

"This article does not site it's references or sources?" Such stupidity is criminal. Anyone who reads it knows that it comes from the original pulps. Duh!

Sorry, guy, but I've ran into this before. Personal experience and knowledge doesn't count. Perhaps if you put the reference data for the actual magazines?

The reference data to the actual magazines? Do they come more stupid? That is like quoting from The Times newspaper and then have someone ask what is The Times newspaper. Stick to the Beano.

Merger suggestion

There seems to be a lot of overlap between this article (which is about a single-character pulp magazine) and Operator No. 5 (which is about the character in question). Could they be combined into one article? 84.71.226.126 19:28, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merging

Since no-one has said or done anything about the above suggestion, I'm going to merge this article into Operator No. 5. Starting ... now. Smalljim 22:29, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]