Jump to content

Talk:Tariffs in the second Trump administration

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Second Trump tariffs)

New section?

[edit]

I'm thinking about adding a new "summary" or "history" section to sort of and discuss how goals have conflicted and shifted. For now there's no good place to include info like this about how negotiations are going. And the whole situation is pretty confusing to keep up with.

I'm wondering first what to call this section—maybe "history" or "chronology" or "key events" or "evolving negotiations" or another idea.

And second, if it should be in timeline or narrative format. Posting to see if anyone has thoughts! satkaratalk 03:07, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I wound up writing "Tariffs in the second Trump administration#Key events and negotiations". satkaratalk 17:05, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Propaganda

[edit]

Would it be fair to say that Trump thinks foreign films are propaganda? He's said "It is, in addition to everything else, messaging and propaganda!" but in the full post it's not clear whether "it" is referring to the films themselves or the incentives by other countries. I lean towards the former because it makes more sense, but its unclear and the source doesn't mention it. Was gonna add this change but wanna ask yall first. Thanks! GiftedWithThought (talk) 21:14, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

While it's true that he said it; we really can't include every oddball thing he has said. O3000, Ret. (talk) 21:26, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Deadline thinks Trump was referring to "foreign productions" but Time, Reuters, and Guardian sidestep by including the whole quote. I think we should either exclude or include the whole quote too. satkaratalk 22:27, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Article is so biased

[edit]

Not that I'm surprised considering how Wikipedia writes about President Trump, but this is just propaganda. May someone please rework this article? 2601:589:5184:8A0:D519:9982:6ED:3154 (talk) 14:18, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There's a chance you're right, but nothing will change without a specific pointer to what is biased. Tarlby (t) (c) 14:55, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi editors,

I’d like to propose adding a factual external resource under the “External links” section that may be useful to readers interested in the scope and impact of U.S. tariffs under the current policy.

Suggested link:

🔗 https://worldscorecard.com/world-facts-and-figures/us-tariffs-and-the-world/

The page includes:

  • A country-by-country tariff table (U.S. tariffs vs. foreign tariffs)
  • A timeline of major 2025 tariff actions
  • Sourced commentary and economic impact summaries
  • A breakdown of sectoral exemptions (e.g., energy, semiconductors)

I’m affiliated with the site as its maintainer and disclose that here for transparency. The content is non-promotional, cites reputable sources (Reuters, Politico, AP, etc.), and is intended to complement the article with detailed reference data not already covered.

Happy to revise or withdraw the suggestion based on feedback. Thank you! Jbird96 (talk) 23:10, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This looks like an interesting site, but is it referenced by any reputable sources? How do we know it's reliable enough to link this way? satkaratalk 00:10, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Satkara. Thanks for following up. The tariff page (and website) is relatively new, with the goal of providing full transparency (Transparency: About World Scorecard) about its data sources. Bing.com, the search engine, considers the page an authoritative one this topic, as ranks top 1-3 rankings for key search phrases such as "us tariffs", "us tariffs list", "tariffs list", and so on. Jbird96 (talk) 09:13, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]