Talk:Red corridor

Skip to table of contents

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Red corridor article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, use the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.

This page is not a forum for general discussion about Red corridor. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Red corridor at the Reference desk.

This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

	A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on October 25, 2008. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Red Corridor* is a term used to describe an impoverished region in the east of India that experiences considerable Naxalite communist militant activity?*
	A news item involving this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "In the news" column on July 13, 2009.

Military history: Asian / South Asia / Cold War / Post-Cold War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Asian military history task force
	South Asian military history task force
	Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989)
	Post-Cold War task force

India: Politics High‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Indian politics (assessed as High-importance).

Politics High‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Socialism High‑importance

	Socialism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Death High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Organizations High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

bias

Article is full of bias for one political agenda and against another and reads like a India's nationalist party propaganda 96.31.190.97 (talk) 09:18, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi 96.31.190.97. It may be so, but it would be helpful if you could point out specific instances of bias? Once you have done that, you should also back it up with some reliable sources (see WP:RS). If you can get that together, we can certainly add your contributions to the article. Your claim seems quite bizarre though - Naxalites seem to be by definition a terrorist group, and I can't seem to see any particular bias in the article. To allege propaganda without adequate proof is quite a claim (see WP:GF). John.k.newton (talk) 13:03, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

96.31.190.97 Multiple Indian parties across the spectrum have engaged in the same policy. You'll have to do a bit better than complaining about the right-wing. Naval Gazer (talk) 20:50, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

History merger needed

It appears that this page was originally titled Red CorridorRed Corridor (which I actually think is better) and was moved here via copy-and-paste. Because of this, I think a history merge is necessary. Charles Essie (talk) 04:27, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Charles Essie: Please see the instructions on Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. ~ Aseleste (t, e | c, l) 14:39, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 15 April 2021

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: No consensus to move. Reasonable doubt has been raised as to whether the "consistently capitalized in a substantial majority" of RS criterion of MOS:CAPS is satisfied here. (non-admin closure) Colin M (talk) 20:49, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Red corridor → Red CorridorRed Corridor – It's a proper noun and the most common name (see Google Ngram Viwer). By the way, there also needs to be a history merge between them (see above). Charles Essie (talk) 20:22, 15 April 2021 (UTC) —Relisting. ~ Aseleste (t, e | c, l) 15:01, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your n-gram link is misleading, omitting "red corridor"; this plus "Red corridor" dominate "Red Corridor" (and many of these are not on topic, capped and lowercase both). Dicklyon (talk) 03:49, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support. It ain't just a red corridor. 98.143.65.225 (talk) 12:50, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – It appears that most sources don't cap this. Certainly not to the threshold in the MOS:CAPS guideline. Dicklyon (talk) 03:42, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Political bias

A lot of the contents of the article have heavy political bias and have low modality used to communicate. Newlightdev (talk) 09:47, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]