This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Computer science related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Computer scienceTemplate:WikiProject Computer scienceComputer science
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
Although this Language is in it's infancy, it is seeing some small traction in various communities. I am not knowledgeable enough on it to fully finish this page but will attempt to make corrections when possible.This page previously was marked for deletion or was deleted without substantial evidence. Milotheshort (talk) 17:00, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
David Gerard removed this reference.[1]
Alex Lashkov is classified as a tech journalist, not blogger. Submissions to site goes under editorial review. HackerNoon is a company, not personal website.Wukuendo (talk) 21:35, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It is literally WP:UGC, so is generally unreliable. Perhaps this qualifies as an expert WP:SPS, but it seems unlikely.
More broadly - there's already solid specialist sources in there like InfoQ. You don't need the UGC group blog, it just makes the article seem puffed up - David Gerard (talk) 14:32, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Was looking at it from the angle that Lashkov could be argued to qualify as a subject matter expert, beyond the issue of the site, but will concede that is a difficult argument. Particularly when the qualifications or credentials are not emphasized by the site or article it pertains to.Wukuendo (talk) 23:51, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
