Talk:Polychoric correlation

Statistics Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Statistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of statistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.StatisticsWikipedia:WikiProject StatisticsTemplate:WikiProject StatisticsStatistics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Psychology

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Could someone add some attempt to say what polychoric correlation is? That's not even remotely hinted at here. Michael Hardy 23:16, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

...and it's still not here. But the article in Basque, unlike this one, seems to say something specific, if far from complete. Can someone translate that? Michael Hardy (talk) 04:46, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wouldn’t it make sense, too, to consider whether this technique is appropriate, and works, for ‪heteroskedastic data, and if it fits with a bayesian approach? Fustbariclation (talk) 19:05, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The page at John Uebersax's website seems to have been hijacked. It redirects to a page in Korean, talking about philosophy. (Arthur van der Harg) 15:15, 30 Jan 2026 (UTC)

Thanks. I've removed that link. Bondegezou (talk) 15:27, 30 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]