Talk:Opencourseware

Open Courseware needs it's own page.

Why? Is it notable? ... discospinster _talk 23:51, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Open Courseware Consortium Support real open couseware programs. Not MITs failed attempt.

MIT professors will never allow MIT to publish full opencouseware. I feel the same way you do. Sorry.

You must establish that the subject is notable by Wikipedia's standards. And it must be in your own words and not copied from the web site. ... discospinster _talk 00:09, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hundreds of Universities giving away free classes is notable. Intire universities free online Free MIT and Free A&M just to name a couple. These are real opencourseware programs. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.113.213.199 (talk) 00:14, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Then establish that in the article, with sources, in your own words. And please sign your talk page posts with four tildes, ~~~~. Thanks, ... discospinster _talk 00:17, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I will work on it. Thanks. Freea&m 00:21, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In any case, it's confusing having "Opencourseware" redirect to MIT OpenCourseWare while "OpenCourseWare" has a page of its own. Tophtucker (talk) 23:11, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]