Agender was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 18 November 2014 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Non-binary. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.
This article is part of WikiProject Gender studies. This WikiProject aims to improve the quality of articles dealing with gender studies and to remove systematic gender bias from Wikipedia. If you would like to participate in the project, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Gender studiesWikipedia:WikiProject Gender studiesTemplate:WikiProject Gender studiesGender studies
This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies
This article was created or improved during Wiki Loves Pride, 2015, 2016 and 2017.Wiki Loves PrideWikipedia:Wiki Loves PrideTemplate:Wiki Loves Pride talkWiki Loves Pride
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, which has been designated as a contentious topic.
The contents of the Neutrois page were merged into Non-binary on 26 November 2014. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page.
Recent data from the Gender Census—the largest survey of people outside the gender binary—indicates that “nonbinary” and “genderqueer” are widely understood as distinct terms or identities, rather than one being an umbrella for the other. Elantrisadjusts (talk) 13:34, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I believe I remember reading recently that a significant portion of intersex people do identify as transgender or non-binary. Unfortunately, I don't remember where I read this, but I'll post source if I come across it, unless someone else does.FourLights (talk) 11:08, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It may be just an accidental coincidence, but the Genderqueer pride flag bears more than a slight resemblance to the flag of the Suffragette movement. Not that there's any likelihood of confusion between them, the latter being completely historical, and extinct as a movement (as well as both flags being broadly in sympathy with one another's ideals); but the similarity is worth pointing out, being expressive of the convergent creative evolution seen in many pieces of iconography.
Nuttyskin (talk) 01:17, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It would require Reliable Sources and, even then, we wouldn't be able to draw any inferences from it unless the sources themselves did. It might be more contentious than you think. The Suffragette flag colours are still used by some feminists and have also been appropriated by some anti-trans groups to create an appearance of feminism. Some of the latter really hate the non-binary flag. DanielRigal (talk) 01:58, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I have no information related to reliable sources; my post was more aimed at stirring up discussion, in case any editors were aware of prior, encyclopedic disputations on the subject.
Not that we should add to the article, but I felt these would be relevant to inform: the author already addressedthis issue. The coincidence was accidental. There are othersources briefly commenting on this [1][2]. And Suffragettes were seen as third-gender at some point [3][4]. LIrala (talk) 23:51, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move reviewafter discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Non-binary gender → Non-binary – Based on data from the Gender Census (the largest demographic survey of people outside the gender binary), respondents overwhelmingly refer to themselves as “non-binary,” not as having “a non-binary gender.” The current title is inconsistent with how similar pages are treated—e.g., “Male” and “Female” are not titled “Male gender” or “Female gender.” “Non-binary” can be both an umbrella term and an identity in itself, and the more concise title would better reflect common usage and align with existing naming conventions. Elantrisadjusts (talk) 13:42, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nominator and Tamzin. Since Non-binary already redirects here, there is no need to disambiguate. The proposed move is more concise and aligns with common usage. --MYCETEAE 🍄🟫—talk15:00, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I agree. Maintaining a title that is less concise, less common, and over-precise (less accurate, really) to conform with WP:NOUN is improper. --MYCETEAE 🍄🟫—talk23:27, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
