Jump to content

Talk:Life

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleLife has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Did You Know Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 17, 2007Peer reviewNot reviewed
June 13, 2012Peer reviewReviewed
December 30, 2015Good article nomineeNot listed
April 4, 2016Good article nomineeNot listed
May 6, 2016Peer reviewReviewed
August 7, 2022Peer reviewReviewed
September 27, 2023Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on November 5, 2023.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that life exists in every part of the biosphere, from the deepest parts of the ocean (bacterium pictured) to altitudes of up to 40 miles (64 km) in the atmosphere?
Current status: Good article

Prions as a life form?

[edit]

A while ago I got into a dispute with another editor about the inclusion of "non-cellular life" in the infobox. I suppose their reasons were good enough but the list had since expanded to include prions. Has anyone ever described prions as alive? I'm not trying to debate here; I would just like to know if there are any reliable sources that support this. I've found some sparse results on Google Scholar but these discussions are generally part of an abstract philosophical discussion about what the definition of life can extend to, often including computer viruses, which I can't imagine will ever be added to the infobox (although I suppose stranger things have happened). Anyway, I'm interested in getting some input on this. — Anonymous 01:37, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

This is NOT A FORUM, and we cannot go on editors' opinions. I've bever seen a reliable source that says so, and reliable sources are all that matter here. Chiswick Chap (talk) 04:04, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
In case I wasn't clear, I don't think prions should be listed; I'm asking if anyone can justify their inclusion (otherwise they should be removed). — Anonymous 04:22, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
The same goes for the numerous other random "non-cellular" particles that have been added over the years. I didn't really want to get back into the previous dispute, but IIRC the justification for including most other particles besides viruses seemed to be leaning into OR (i.e. the sources were not explicitly calling them alive). However it's been a while and my memory's foggy. I could also use a short rest from Wikipedia after a long day of editing. — Anonymous 04:28, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
You're asking for removal not addition, I see. I've removed a listicle from the infobox as off-topic and not discussed in the text. Thanks for drawing it to attention. Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:32, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]