Talk:Labyrinth: The Computer Game

Labyrinth: The Computer Game has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: October 6, 2015. (Reviewed version).

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Featured content candidates

LittleBigPlanet (2008 video game) (nom)

Good article nominations

Pokémon Stadium (nom)
Tom Clancy's The Division 2 (nom)
Cry of Fear (start)
Transfer Pak (start)
Necromorph (start)
Tala (Darkwatch) (start)
Ayane (Dead or Alive) (start)
Tetris (nom)
Pokémon competitive play (start)
Dying Light: The Following (start)
Club Drive (nom)
Pachirisu (nom)
Typhlosion (nom)
Echoes of Mana (start)
Embodiment of Scarlet Devil (start)
Andrew Artiaga (nom)
Atomic Betty (video game) (start)
Crash: Mind over Mutant (Nintendo DS video game) (start)
Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney Trilogy (start)
Clutch Gaming (start)
Below the Root (video game) (start)
AlphaBounce (start)
Herobrine (start)
Contradiction: Spot the Liar! (start)

DYK nominations

No did you know nominations

Reviews and reassessments

Articles that need...

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article contains broken links to one or more target anchors:

[[MSX#MSX2|MSX2]] The anchor (#MSX2) has been deleted by other users before.

The anchors may have been removed, renamed, or are no longer valid. Please fix them by following the link above, checking the page history of the target pages, or updating the links.

Remove this template after the problem is fixed | Report an error

Reference material

Here's what I've found so far:

More later. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 20:05, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Labyrinth: The Computer Game/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: PresN (talk · contribs) 19:29, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Starting to review this. --Pres N 19:29, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And... unsurprisingly I don't have much, seeing as you're one of the best article writers in the VG project. There were couple instances where you had the period inside of a not-a-full-sentence quote, which I fixed. You're missing accessdates on your online sources, though that seems to have been intentional, and the two IGN sources could use an archive. As far as GA goes, you're golden- great job building an article on an 80s video game! --Pres N 19:57, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a ton for the review! (Not to mention the flattering comments.) I'll archive those IGN sources soon. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 20:15, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Commercial Success

The article twice states that the game was a greater commercial success than the film. Are there any figures for this? Computer game grosses in the 1980s were generally kept secret. -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 20:45, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Just came to say this.

The reception segment states that "In the United States, Labyrinth was more commercially successful than the film upon which it was based", and attributes this to source [11]. Upon review, I can't seem to find information regarding the financial success throughout the entire book (and especially not within the 2 pages referenced).

I would recommend either removing this information, or finding another source to attribute it to. TrueDon Elf (talk) 03:28, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]