Talk:Knowledge mapping

I am not at all sure that this page adds any value.  Its initial insertion looked like it might be a lead into an advertising link to a system.

I have made one set of alternations, to broaden it a bit. However if other people do not get involved and make some sustantial contributions then I suggest the article is nominated for deletion with a small entry placed in the Knowledge Management article.--Snowded 19:16, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the slow reaction. For some reason my 'watch' didn't work. I published this entry some time ago and it was not intended as advertisement. I've done extensive research on kmapping (recently an article I wrote a.o. was published in the JKM about this topic). --Sdriessen 12:53, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I formated your above post to wiki standards - apologies but it makes it easier to read. The article was a simple para and some pages references. I redirected it to KM and took the text and the references accross. Suggest it is developed there, if it grows and other people engage then it can become a separate article --Snowded 22:06, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

NEW ARTICLE

I have made some substational alternations to the new article which read as an advert for a particular implementation. I still think this article should be diverted to KM, but if there is interest it could grow to an interesting article. However it needs to be objective and cover the range of techniques available

I don't see any activity here to justify keeping the article. Does anyone object if I divert the material back to the KM one?

Ok there is no discussion here, and no activity on the page. The material was already placed in the KM article so I am going to divert and delete--Snowded 22:13, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]