Talk:Knowledge

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Knowledge article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives (index): 1, 2: 12 months

Knowledge is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination was archived. For older candidates, please check the archive.

Knowledge has been listed as one of the Philosophy and religion good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
October 30, 2022	Peer review	Reviewed
March 9, 2023	Good article nominee	Listed
January 23, 2024	Peer review	Reviewed
April 2, 2024	Featured article candidate	Not promoted
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on March 20, 2023. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that it is controversial whether knowledge* is the same as justified true belief?*
Current status: Former featured article candidate, current good article

Philosophy: Epistemology High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Epistemology

Education Top‑importance

	Education portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Psychology Low‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Anthropology: Oral tradition

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthropology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anthropology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthropologyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthropologyTemplate:WikiProject AnthropologyAnthropology
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by Oral tradition taskforce.

Semi-protected edit request on 23 October 2024

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Misspelling/Typo: "A less radical limit of knowledge is identified by falliblists," should read "...fallibilists," 96.83.19.33 (talk) 16:18, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Phlsph7 (talk) 16:25, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

can someone fix where it says "certain certain" as the article is locked thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.4.43.220 (talk) 22:59, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Thanks for catching that. Patrick 🐈‍⬛ (talk) 23:37, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"Knowers" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Knowers has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 January 29 § Knowers until a consensus is reached. Thepharoah17 (talk) 18:49, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]