Talk:Hunt-class destroyer

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips

Military history: Maritime / British / European / World War II C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	World War II task force

Guns

@Nigel Ish: Er, I put four not six, you changed it to six? Keith-264 (talk) 09:02, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes - Type IVs had six guns, like the Type II - the different, longer, design of the Type IVs allowed the extra gun mounting to be carried along with torpedo tubes.Nigel Ish (talk) 12:02, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ta Keith-264 (talk) 14:05, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits

@BiscuitsBeforeBias: Greetings, liked your edits, do you have a source for them pls? Regards Keith-264 (talk) 09:19, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

All the sources are linked on the corresponding ships pages BiscuitsBeforeBias (talk) 19:44, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks but you need to cite them here (not by copying the cites elsewhere but by using reliable sources). Regards Keith-264 (talk) 21:30, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free or just revert to how it was before, I'm not fussed either way...

BiscuitsBeforeBias (talk) 06:56, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'd rather you cited them, they're rather good. Regards Keith-264 (talk) 21:17, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]