Talk:Human language technology

Worst article ever?

This article appears to see HLT through a very narrow lense. It ignore decades of HLT work prior to Wydner, as well as decades since. It makes amazing claims ("invented HLT"???) and fails to document them. It appears to be little more than self-promotion. An encyclopedia article must consist of more than dozens of quotes from one practitioner in a field. —johndburger 20:51, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I would simply redirect this to Language technology (which should also be cleaned up). --Silvonen 05:19, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]