Talk:Fluent (artificial intelligence)
Appearance
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I have written the article trying to avoid complications and trying to put together the different definitions of fluents in different formalisms. This caused some problems:
- I have assumed that fluents are truth-valued for the sake of simplicity, but this is not always the case; I think the better solution is to add a separate paragraph rather than making the definition more general from the beginning;
- I have used “the predicate ... ”; this is of course not a predicate but a literal using that predicate. Is there any way to say something correct without introducing the complication “we use a predicate so that ... ”?
Categories:
- Start-Class Philosophy articles
- Low-importance Philosophy articles
- Start-Class logic articles
- Low-importance logic articles
- Logic task force articles
- Start-Class Computer science articles
- Unknown-importance Computer science articles
- WikiProject Computer science articles
- Start-Class Artificial Intelligence articles
- Unknown-importance Artificial Intelligence articles
- WikiProject Artificial Intelligence articles
