Talk:Dump and chase
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
 | On 22 February 2025, it was proposed that this article be moved from Dump'n'Chase to Dump and chase. The result of the discussion was moved. |
Requested move 22 February 2025
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) feminist🩸 (talk) 11:58, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
Dump'n'Chase → Dump and chase – Per consistency with listed sources. Filing as RM to give article creator a chance to voice objections in case there's something I missed. Left guide (talk) 23:22, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support as per nom. 162 etc. (talk) 00:30, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support per nom. I'm also wondering if there is a MOS on this usage? Conyo14 (talk) 01:06, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support as per WP:COMMONNAME in the cited sources. Flibirigit (talk) 08:11, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support per nom. Rlendog (talk) 13:52, 26 February 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.