Talk:Differential extraction

Crime and Criminal Biography Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Enforcement Mid‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Law Enforcement. Please Join, Create, and Assess.Law EnforcementWikipedia:WikiProject Law EnforcementTemplate:WikiProject Law EnforcementLaw enforcement
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Microbiology Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microbiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Microbiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MicrobiologyWikipedia:WikiProject MicrobiologyTemplate:WikiProject MicrobiologyMicrobiology
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sexology and sexuality Low‑importance

	Human sexuality portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

gender bias

this article is extremely gender biased

it generalizes as if all rapists are males, even though it is not always true —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.215.168.159 (talk) 09:37, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You are correct in that this article assumes the rapist is a male -- it is only performed when sperm cells have been identified microscopically or if the case history indicates a male perpetrator. This technique would not even be considered for a female rapist, as she does not produce sperm cells. I don't believe that there is a statement in the article saying that all rapists are males. Sekiyu (talk) 06:07, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lead section has extra information

I have tagged this article for clean-up because the lead section has a whole lot of extra information that is not in the body of the article. See MOS:LEAD for purpose of the lead. It should provide an accessible overview to the whole article. It should not contain half the article. Information in the lead should be expanded upon in the body of the article too. For this article, all five paragraphs of the lead should be part of the body of the article. The second sentence, seems to me to be the key sentence of the lead, while everything else is mostly details. See WP:LEADFOLLOWSBODY - Cameron Dewe (talk) 06:53, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Globalize

I added a Globalize clean-up tag to the statement about untested rape kits in the United States. Is this issue a US specific problem or one experienced world-wide? It seems to me that the issue may be more to do with the funding and resourcing model used for laboratories in different countries than simply an issue with the analysis being labour intensive. If the appropriate level of resources are not devoted to the testing then the laboratories are not going to be able to process the kits. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 06:53, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]