Talk:Colossus (supercomputer)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Colossus (supercomputer) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Artificial Intelligence Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Artificial Intelligence, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Artificial intelligence on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Artificial IntelligenceWikipedia:WikiProject Artificial IntelligenceTemplate:WikiProject Artificial IntelligenceArtificial Intelligence
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Computer hardware task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Tempting fate

Did no one read the book or watch the movie? Colossus

That fictional computer killed its creators and enslaved mankind. Now we name the biggest one yet built after it? 24.206.84.188 (talk) 11:45, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

We did not. Dorsetonian (talk) 13:04, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Another Colossus

In theory, it could also be a reference to the literally anti-fascist Colossus computer — Preceding unsigned comment added by TorLillqvist (talk • contribs) 14:49, 11 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

bias

i feel that this article has some slight bias, but maybe it's just me. it feels a bit accusatory I think. Jan 26 2026 update:I think it is a lot better now, with no bias.BP131527 (talk) 02:28, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

there's a lot of clear bias for sure ~2026-51071-4 (talk) 03:10, 24 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]