Talk:Brahmi script

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Brahmi script article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 3 months

Writing systems Top‑importance

	Writing portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Writing systems, a WikiProject interested in improving the encyclopaedic coverage and content of articles relating to writing systems on Wikipedia. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project’s talk page.Writing systemsWikipedia:WikiProject Writing systemsTemplate:WikiProject Writing systemsWriting system
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

India: History Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

This article was the subject of an educational assignment that ended on 2008 fall semester. Further details are available here.

Removal of Parent system

The parent source of Brahmi Script is not confirmed to be Proto-Sinaitic script or Phoenician alphabet or Aramaic alphabet, it can also be indigenous, therefore there is no confirmed source of Brahmi Script, removal of entire parent system is advised, or at least put valid citations.

Bhattiprolu?

Can someone explain this edit-war? —Tamfang (talk) 05:05, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Same Adiiitya (talk) 08:33, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I guess that's a no. —Tamfang (talk) 20:21, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Max Weber

Isn't that his brother Alfred Weber? 141.20.217.196 (talk) 13:39, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, it is Albrecht Weber (no relation, I think). I've corrected it - thanks for pointing this out. RegentsPark (comment) 13:52, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]