Talk:Bitwarden
Appearance
| This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Security
[edit]As this software is security-related I feel it necessary to implement a section discussing the security of the software. I myself do not feel that I am knowledgable enough to start it.
Very Fantastic Dude (talk) 14:27, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Authenticator app
[edit]The same devs just made their own Authenticator app. Should we make a section about that? I was scrolling their social media and the 2FA app was out. Ahri.boy (talk) 15:17, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
Is Bitwarden open core?
[edit]If yes, how about replacing "a freemium open-source" with "an open-core" in the beginning of the page? --Pohli (talk) 11:21, 1 February 2026 (UTC)
Categories:
- C-Class software articles
- Low-importance software articles
- C-Class software articles of Low-importance
- C-Class Computing articles
- Unknown-importance Computing articles
- All Computing articles
- All Software articles
- C-Class Computer security articles
- Mid-importance Computer security articles
- C-Class Computer security articles of Mid-importance
- Mid-importance Computing articles
- All Computer security articles
- C-Class Cryptography articles
- Low-importance Cryptography articles
- C-Class Computer science articles
- Low-importance Computer science articles
- WikiProject Computer science articles
- WikiProject Cryptography articles
- C-Class Technology articles
- WikiProject Technology articles
- Low-importance Computing articles


