Talk:Artemis program
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Artemis program article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 6 months |
| This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (center, color, defense, realize, traveled) and some terms may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
| This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Artemis 3 mission update
[edit]Hi everyone. I updated the Artemis 3 mission for launch in September 2024 according to NASA's office of safety and mission assurance. Here is the reference https://web.archive.org/web/20210614003506/https://sma.nasa.gov/docs/default-source/sma-disciplines-and-programs/smsr/smsr-intergrated-master-schedule_24feb2020aab4a269d2a865b9a1a0ff0f003ca228.pdf?sfvrsn=8290faf8_26
This article's mobile view for images is glitched. Any idea how to fix it?
[edit]This article's mobile view is glitched. In the Artemis II subsection, the images appear fine on pc, but when looked at through a phone, Koch and Hansen shift places which messes up the caption (the caption says Koch is the center image, but on a phone, her image is on the right and Hansen shows in the center). Does anyone know how to fix this? — EarthDude (wanna talk?) 19:11, 30 September 2025 (UTC)
Existential threat due to reusable launch vehicles?
[edit]"The program faced its greatest existential threat as the economics of launch costs began to change drastically due to reusable launch vehicles in the early 2020s."
Is this clear, and if not can it be clarified? I don't know anything about Artemis and that's why I was reading the article, but I would think that reusable launch vehicles would lower the costs and thus not threaten the program. Sorry if there's something obvious that I don't see but should. Bret Sterling (talk) 16:59, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
- I believe the point of that sentence is that as commercial launch providers have begun offering much cheaper access to orbit, it has created political and economic pressure on the Artemis program, which at this time is, by law, reliant on the far more expensive, expendable Space Launch System. The “existential threat” is the persistent questions about whether Artemis is sustainable in an era of drastically lower commercial launch costs. RickyCourtney (talk) 17:07, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
- Wikipedia articles that use American English
- B-Class spaceflight articles
- High-importance spaceflight articles
- WikiProject Spaceflight articles
- B-Class Astronomy articles
- High-importance Astronomy articles
- B-Class Astronomy articles of High-importance
- B-Class Moon articles
- High-importance Moon articles
- Moon task force articles
- B-Class Solar System articles
- High-importance Solar System articles
- Solar System task force
- B-Class United States articles
- High-importance United States articles
- B-Class United States articles of High-importance
- B-Class United States Government articles
- High-importance United States Government articles
- WikiProject United States Government articles
- WikiProject United States articles


