Talk:Artemis program

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Artemis program article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2: 6 months

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (center, color, defense, realize, traveled) and some terms may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Artemis program was nominated as a Natural sciences good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (December 9, 2025, reviewed version). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

Spaceflight High‑importance

	Spaceflight portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Astronomy: Moon / Solar System High‑importance

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Moon task force (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by Solar System task force (assessed as High-importance).

United States: Government High‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as High-importance).

Artemis 3 mission update

Hi everyone. I updated the Artemis 3 mission for launch in September 2024 according to NASA's office of safety and mission assurance. Here is the reference https://web.archive.org/web/20210614003506/https://sma.nasa.gov/docs/default-source/sma-disciplines-and-programs/smsr/smsr-intergrated-master-schedule_24feb2020aab4a269d2a865b9a1a0ff0f003ca228.pdf?sfvrsn=8290faf8_26

This article's mobile view for images is glitched. Any idea how to fix it?

This article's mobile view is glitched. In the Artemis II subsection, the images appear fine on pc, but when looked at through a phone, Koch and Hansen shift places which messes up the caption (the caption says Koch is the center image, but on a phone, her image is on the right and Hansen shows in the center). Does anyone know how to fix this? — EarthDude (wanna talk?) 19:11, 30 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Existential threat due to reusable launch vehicles?

"The program faced its greatest existential threat as the economics of launch costs began to change drastically due to reusable launch vehicles in the early 2020s."

Is this clear, and if not can it be clarified? I don't know anything about Artemis and that's why I was reading the article, but I would think that reusable launch vehicles would lower the costs and thus not threaten the program. Sorry if there's something obvious that I don't see but should. Bret Sterling (talk) 16:59, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I believe the point of that sentence is that as commercial launch providers have begun offering much cheaper access to orbit, it has created political and economic pressure on the Artemis program, which at this time is, by law, reliant on the far more expensive, expendable Space Launch System. The “existential threat” is the persistent questions about whether Artemis is sustainable in an era of drastically lower commercial launch costs. RickyCourtney (talk) 17:07, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What I think is that they will probably execute at least four missions with SLS until a commercial vehicle can be procured and executed with it test flights are completed. Eth132489 (talk) 03:06, 28 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

GA review

Unsuccessful. Z1720 (talk) 03:04, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Artemis program/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Deborah.artemis (talk · contribs) 20:58, 7 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Z1720 (talk · contribs) 03:00, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Review

Unfortunately, I am going to quick fail this nomination. The article has lots of uncited statements, including entire paragraphs and the nominator has not significantly contributed to the article. Once everything in the article is properly cited, this can be renominated. Z1720 (talk) 03:00, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not particularly informative in closing. Maybe you can provide examples. Deborah.artemis (talk) 00:55, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The main problem is the last source is a tweet! Ha. Too funny. Deborah.artemis (talk) 00:57, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]