You are an administrator, so you may disregard the message below.
You are seeing this because of the limitations of {{If extended confirmed}} and {{If administrator}}. You can hide this message box by adding the following to a new line of your common.css page:
.ECR-edit-request-warning{display:none;}
Stop: You may only use this page to create an edit request
This page is related to a topic subject to the extended-confirmed restriction. You are not an extended-confirmed user, so you must not edit or discuss this topic anywhere on Wikipedia except to make an edit request. (Additional details are in the message box just below this one.)
The following restrictions apply to everyone editing this article:
All participants in formal discussions (RfCs, RMs, etc) within the area of conflict are urged to keep their comments concise, and are limited to 1,000 words per discussion. Citations and quotations (whether from sources, Wikipedia articles, Wikipedia discussions, or elsewhere) do not count toward the word limit.
You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours (except in limited circumstances)
You must be logged-in and extended-confirmed to edit or discuss this topic on any page (except for making edit requests, provided they are not disruptive)
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Explosives, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Explosives on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ExplosivesWikipedia:WikiProject ExplosivesTemplate:WikiProject ExplosivesExplosives
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Israel, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Israel on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IsraelWikipedia:WikiProject IsraelTemplate:WikiProject IsraelIsrael-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lebanon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lebanon-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LebanonWikipedia:WikiProject LebanonTemplate:WikiProject LebanonLebanon
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Syria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Syria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SyriaWikipedia:WikiProject SyriaTemplate:WikiProject SyriaSyria
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Telecommunications, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Telecommunications on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TelecommunicationsWikipedia:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTemplate:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTelecommunications
"The attack killed at least 42 people, including at least 12 civilians, and injured around 4,000 civilians, according to the Lebanese government."
This is misleading and leads the reader to assume 4000 Lebanese civilians, unaffiliated with Hezbollah, were injured. It should be edited to state that according to the Lebanese government, the attack injured 4,000 members of Hezbollah, including those who held various non-combatant roles within the organization. Those who were issued pagers, were affiliated with Hezbollah in some shape or form. This should be made clear instead of plainly stating "4000 civilians". The citations throughout this page supports this assertion, and in fact is stated clearly in other later parts of this article.2600:4808:6395:1200:CCB4:B7BD:DC89:DABA (talk) 21:57, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It is not possible to know what readers assume from a statement attributed to the Lebanese government so there is no point talking about that. And the statement "The citations throughout this page supports this assertion, and in fact is stated clearly in other later parts of this article" does not appear to be consistent with the Deaths and injuries section. Sean.hoyland (talk) 06:01, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I concede that the statement is attributed to the Lebanese government, and as such does not need any context provided the direct citation. On that, I stand corrected.
However, for the wiki page to not further inform the reader that pagers were held by members of hezbollah is withholding factual, accurate, and reported information and should be provided to the reader as much as the statement by the Lebanese government was provided to the reader.
I agree with you that the lead could be better. But given that WP:ARBECR limits you to making specific edit requests per WP:EDITXY and given that the lead is just a summary of the article body, what I suggest is that you focus on one or more edit requests that amend the body of the article to include the information that you think is missing or not covered adequately. Then editors can re-summarize the article to incorporate that information in the lead. The lead is dependent on the article body. A valid reason to change a lead section is that it does not properly summarize the article body, not that it doesn't say what you want. Sean.hoyland (talk) 08:21, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
"Jewish-American political scientist..." Jewishness not relevant in this context.
I don’t believe Eliot Cohen’s Jewish background is relevant in the context of the paragraph where he is mentioned. His ethnicity has no clear bearing on the assessment he made about the impact of the attack, which falls within his area of expertise. Stating that he is Jewish comes across as an attempt to flag a potential bias, which plays into the stereotype of Jews (regardless of their nationality) having "dual loyalty" with Israel, which is widely recognized as an antisemitic trope. I doubt that was the intention, especially since the page is protected, but I wanted to raise the concern. However, if the intent really was to suggest that Cohen may have a strong pro-Israel stance and that this could influence his judgment, and if that is something supported by his record (which I don't know), I think it is more appropriate to instead refer to his record, or his political conservatism. FelixDeClercq (talk) 17:29, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I agree. I've removed it. If his article had included a sentence like 'as a Jewish-American...', maybe it would be relevant, at least from his perspective, but there is currently no source-based reason to include it. Sean.hoyland (talk) 17:55, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Replace the Infobox civilian attack with some infobox relevant to military operations, because that's what this was. Jerdle (talk) 12:35, 12 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
.svg?lang=en){kind=small}
