Related changes
Enter a page name to see changes on pages linked to or from that page. (To see members of a category, enter Category:Name of category). Changes to pages on your Watchlist are shown in bold with a green bullet. See more at Help:Related changes.
List of abbreviations (help):
- D
- Edit made at Wikidata
- r
- Edit flagged by ORES
- N
- New page
- m
- Minor edit
- b
- Bot edit
- (±123)
- Page byte size change
- Temporarily watched page
4 June 2025
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations 20:14 +198 AirshipJungleman29 talk contribs (→Should GA instructions be updated to state if trading GA reviews (quid pro quo) is permitted?: seems fairly obvious to me)
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations 20:04 +258 Chipmunkdavis talk contribs (→Should GA instructions be updated to state if trading GA reviews (quid pro quo) is permitted?: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations 20:02 +403 Thebiguglyalien talk contribs (→Should GA instructions be updated to state if trading GA reviews (quid pro quo) is permitted?: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations 19:58 +352 Premeditated Chaos talk contribs (→Should GA instructions be updated to state if trading GA reviews (quid pro quo) is permitted?: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations 19:57 +226 Noleander talk contribs (→Should GA instructions be updated to state if trading GA reviews (quid pro quo) is permitted?: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations 19:57 +784 Chipmunkdavis talk contribs (→Should GA instructions be updated to state if trading GA reviews (quid pro quo) is permitted?: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations 19:47 +467 Chipmunkdavis talk contribs (→Should GA instructions be updated to state if trading GA reviews (quid pro quo) is permitted?: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations 19:18 +187 Kusma talk contribs (→Should GA instructions be updated to state if trading GA reviews (quid pro quo) is permitted?: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations 19:06 +32 Noleander talk contribs (→Should GA instructions be updated to state if trading GA reviews (quid pro quo) is permitted?)
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations 19:05 +1,177 Noleander talk contribs (→Should GA instructions be updated to state if trading GA reviews (quid pro quo) is permitted?: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations 14:11 +1,000 Premeditated Chaos talk contribs (→Should GA instructions be updated to state if trading GA reviews (quid pro quo) is permitted?: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations 11:38 +445 IntentionallyDense talk contribs (→Should GA instructions be updated to state if trading GA reviews (quid pro quo) is permitted?: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist m Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations 08:58 +37,875 Materialscientist talk contribs (Reverted edits by Hy5uyujjyhtyu7jy (talk) (HG) (3.4.13)) Tags: Huggle Rollback
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations 08:57 −37,875 Hy5uyujjyhtyu7jy talk contribs (←Replaced content with 'hi baddies cats are better than stupid sharty dogs. dogs disgustng sweat and spit get on you meanwhile cats like to be calm') Tags: Replaced Reverted
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations 06:56 −5 Chipmunkdavis talk contribs (→Should GA instructions be updated to state if trading GA reviews (quid pro quo) is permitted?: Actually I vaguely recall this coming up since)
- diffhist m Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations 06:56 +5 Chipmunkdavis talk contribs (→Should GA instructions be updated to state if trading GA reviews (quid pro quo) is permitted?: wording)
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations 06:55 +267 Chipmunkdavis talk contribs (→Should GA instructions be updated to state if trading GA reviews (quid pro quo) is permitted?: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations 05:59 +18 Noleander talk contribs (→Should GA instructions be updated to state if trading GA reviews (quid pro quo) is permitted?)
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations 05:58 +19 Noleander talk contribs (→Should GA instructions be updated to state if trading GA reviews (quid pro quo) is permitted?)
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations 05:57 −3 Noleander talk contribs (→Should GA instructions be updated to state if trading GA reviews (quid pro quo) is permitted?)
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations 05:57 −69 Noleander talk contribs (→Should GA instructions be updated to state if trading GA reviews (quid pro quo) is permitted?)
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations 05:55 +753 Noleander talk contribs (→Should GA instructions be updated to state if trading GA reviews (quid pro quo) is permitted?: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations 05:49 +546 Noleander talk contribs (→Should GA instructions be updated to state if trading GA reviews (quid pro quo) is permitted?: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations 05:47 +381 Premeditated Chaos talk contribs (→Should GA instructions be updated to state if trading GA reviews (quid pro quo) is permitted?: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations 05:28 +125 Chipmunkdavis talk contribs (→Should GA instructions be updated to state if trading GA reviews (quid pro quo) is permitted?: Stronger)
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations 05:27 +268 Chipmunkdavis talk contribs (→Should GA instructions be updated to state if trading GA reviews (quid pro quo) is permitted?: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations 05:09 +4 Noleander talk contribs (→Should GA instructions be updated to state if trading GA reviews (quid pro quo) is permitted?)
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations 05:08 +1,312 Noleander talk contribs (→Should GA instructions be updated to state if trading GA reviews (quid pro quo) is permitted?: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations 04:48 +1,126 Chipmunkdavis talk contribs (→Should GA instructions be updated to state if trading GA reviews (quid pro quo) is permitted?: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations 04:23 +1,170 Noleander talk contribs (→Should GA instructions be updated to state if trading GA reviews (quid pro quo) is permitted?: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations 03:30 +447 Noleander talk contribs (→Should GA instructions be updated to state if trading GA reviews (quid pro quo) is permitted?: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations 03:02 +359 IntentionallyDense talk contribs (→Should GA instructions be updated to state if trading GA reviews (quid pro quo) is permitted?: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations 02:59 −3 Chipmunkdavis talk contribs (→Should GA instructions be updated to state if trading GA reviews (quid pro quo) is permitted?: What is wrong with my words today)
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations 02:58 +309 Chipmunkdavis talk contribs (→Should GA instructions be updated to state if trading GA reviews (quid pro quo) is permitted?: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations 02:55 −5 Noleander talk contribs (→Should GA instructions be updated to state if trading GA reviews (quid pro quo) is permitted?)
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations 02:54 +575 Noleander talk contribs (→Should GA instructions be updated to state if trading GA reviews (quid pro quo) is permitted?: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations 02:43 +673 IntentionallyDense talk contribs (→Should GA instructions be updated to state if trading GA reviews (quid pro quo) is permitted?: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations 02:40 +650 IntentionallyDense talk contribs (→Should GA instructions be updated to state if trading GA reviews (quid pro quo) is permitted?: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations 02:32 +6 Chipmunkdavis talk contribs (→Should GA instructions be updated to state if trading GA reviews (quid pro quo) is permitted?: words)
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations 02:32 +696 Chipmunkdavis talk contribs (→Should GA instructions be updated to state if trading GA reviews (quid pro quo) is permitted?: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist User:Element10101 02:04 +89 Element10101 talk contribs (→Pages (in order of creation))
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations 02:00 +435 Noleander talk contribs (→Should GA instructions be updated to state if trading GA reviews (quid pro quo) is permitted?: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations 01:38 +889 Premeditated Chaos talk contribs (→Should GA instructions be updated to state if trading GA reviews (quid pro quo) is permitted?: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations 01:27 +162 David Eppstein talk contribs (→Should GA instructions be updated to state if trading GA reviews (quid pro quo) is permitted?: +)
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations 01:25 +462 David Eppstein talk contribs (→Should GA instructions be updated to state if trading GA reviews (quid pro quo) is permitted?: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations 01:18 +593 Premeditated Chaos talk contribs (→Should GA instructions be updated to state if trading GA reviews (quid pro quo) is permitted?: cmt)
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations 00:52 +826 Noleander talk contribs (→Should GA instructions be updated to state if trading GA reviews (quid pro quo) is permitted?: new section) Tag: New topic
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations 00:25 +173 GMH Melbourne talk contribs (→New proposal: abolish the role of GARC coordinator: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations 00:23 +242 GMH Melbourne talk contribs (→New proposal: abolish the role of GARC coordinator: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations 00:20 +659 GMH Melbourne talk contribs (→New proposal: abolish the role of GARC coordinator: Reply) Tag: Reply