Related changes
Appearance
Enter a page name to see changes on pages linked to or from that page. (To see members of a category, enter Category:Name of category). Changes to pages on your Watchlist are shown in bold with a green bullet. See more at Help:Related changes.
List of abbreviations (help):
- D
- Edit made at Wikidata
- r
- Edit flagged by ORES
- N
- New page
- m
- Minor edit
- b
- Bot edit
- (±123)
- Page byte size change
- Temporarily watched page
31 July 2025
- diffhist Women in music 23:09 −79 82.45.50.227 talk (→Singer-songwriters)
- diffhist Women in music 23:07 +1 82.45.50.227 talk (→Singer-songwriters: grammar)
- diffhist Women in music 23:07 +1 82.45.50.227 talk (→Jazz)
- diffhist Women in music 23:06 +18 82.45.50.227 talk (→Jazz)
- diffhist m Wikipedia talk:Did you know 22:15 +2 Gerda Arendt talk contribs (→May I reply to what was open?)
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Did you know 22:14 +197 Gerda Arendt talk contribs (→May I reply to what was open?: more thanks)
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Did you know 22:01 +61 Gerda Arendt talk contribs (→May I reply to what was open?: some more numbers)
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Did you know 21:50 +919 AirshipJungleman29 talk contribs (→Eschiva of Bures: re)
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Did you know 21:48 +267 Gerda Arendt talk contribs (→May I reply to what was open?: Thanks for the review of Template:Did you know nominations/Magdalena_Hinterdobler.)
- diffhist Women in music 21:32 −59 Augnablik talk contribs (Changed "female" to woman or women throughout the article where needed.) Tag: Visual edit
- diffhist Women in music 21:10 +231 Augnablik talk contribs (At the start of the Issues and approaches section, I placed a Cleanup Reorganize template, pointing out that because much of the material had already appeared throughout the article, if a final section was really felt needed, the content and layout should be rethought and reorganized.) Tag: Visual edit
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Did you know 21:04 −109 Kingsif talk contribs (→João Barrento (nom): trivia, and could complicate the point)
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Did you know 21:03 +195 Kingsif talk contribs (→More Jilly Cooper nominations: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist Women in music 20:33 −1,429 Augnablik talk contribs (Still in the Movements, organizations, events and genres section, deleted (Mexico) from the Now Girls Rule sub-subsection under Organizations. Under the Festivals sub-section, deleted any festival not clearly a music festival (2 paragraphs); also deleted Lilith Fair as a heading as it was a singleton and the information could be integrated into the rest of the material on festivals. Tightened up other parts of the text that were extraneous, though occasionally added some text.) Tag: Visual edit
- diffhist Women in music 19:51 −4,028 Augnablik talk contribs (In the Movements, organizations, events and genres, section, continued tightening up in particular, including bulletizing a number of undertakings of Now Girls Rule ... and, most importantly, deletion of 4 paragraphs of the Riot Grrrl subsection that had nothing to do directly with music but were more about the overall movement itself.) Tag: Visual edit
- diffhist Women in music 18:46 −169 Augnablik talk contribs (In the Other musical professions section, continued tightening up and repositioning material for better clarity and flow, especially in the DJs and turntablists subsection. Also reworked Marion Lignana Rosenberg's infobox.) Tag: Visual edit
- diffhist Women in music 18:02 −49 Augnablik talk contribs (In the Music critics section, tightened up the wording for clarity and flow. Also deleted a redundant sentence.) Tag: Visual edit
- diffhist Women in music 17:48 −828 Augnablik talk contribs (In the Conducting section, made major changes toward clarity and flow by rrepositioning several paragraphs as well as removing the one starting "The turn for women's rights in music" because it's both somewhat redundant and seemingly not quite accurate about direct connection of the lack of women's rights in music and the start of the feminist movement in America in 1848. Also corrected the spelling of one woman conductor and did some other minor proofreading corrections.) Tag: Visual edit
- diffhist m Wikipedia talk:Did you know 16:55 +7 Flibirigit talk contribs (→Older nominations needing DYK reviewers: strike one)
- diffhist m Wikipedia talk:Did you know 16:53 +14 Flibirigit talk contribs (→Older nominations needing DYK reviewers: strike one)
- diffhist Women in music 16:51 −177 Augnablik talk contribs (In the Music educators subsection of Music scholars and educators, I put some effort into tightening up and integration of material, although it needs far more — removing as well as adding words for better flow and greater clarity. Deleted the Individuals sub-subsection which had been a singleton heading and instead led into it with an introductory phrase.) Tag: Visual edit
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Did you know 16:44 +1,960 Gerda Arendt talk contribs (→not interesting?: thanks)
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Did you know 14:46 +455 RoySmith talk contribs (→not interesting?: Closing discussion (DiscussionCloser v.1.7.3-8))
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Did you know 14:41 +260 Darth Stabro talk contribs (→More Jilly Cooper nominations: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Did you know 13:59 +277 RoySmith talk contribs (→More Jilly Cooper nominations: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Did you know 13:36 +555 Lajmmoore talk contribs (→More Jilly Cooper nominations: new section) Tag: New topic
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Did you know 12:47 +457 RoySmith talk contribs (→Emirto de Lima: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist Template:Did you know 12:46 +18 Firefangledfeathers talk contribs (→Hooks: forgot to include a link Fram suggested)
- diffhist Template:Did you know 12:43 +22 Firefangledfeathers talk contribs (→Hooks: specify venue that barred Bourgonnier; suggested at WP:ERRORS by User:Fram)
- diffhist m Women in music 12:35 −4 Arjayay talk contribs (Duplicate word removed)
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Did you know 12:31 +298 Surtsicna talk contribs (→Eschiva of Bures: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Did you know 12:30 +124 Arconning talk contribs (→Emirto de Lima: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Did you know 12:28 +226 Kusma talk contribs (→S-1 (supercomputer): Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Did you know 12:23 +235 RoySmith talk contribs (→S-1 (supercomputer): Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist Women in music 12:22 −305 Augnablik talk contribs (In the Japanese and Jewish music subsections of the Eastern music section, tightened up the material. In the Music scholars and educators section, Ethnomusicologists subsection, did major editing to both sequence the information and to tighten it up — I would recommend that someone very familiar with Ellen Koskoff's work look this over for accuracy of my interpretation, though I think I correctly understood. At any rate, the subsection needed an overhaul.) Tag: Visual edit
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Did you know 12:21 +313 RoySmith talk contribs (→Eschiva of Bures: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Did you know 11:39 +1,155 Gerda Arendt talk contribs (→Is the rejection of a nomination based on "hooks not perceived as interesting" a good idea?: answer a question with a question)
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Did you know 11:35 +2,435 4meter4 talk contribs (→Is the rejection of a nomination based on "hooks not perceived as interesting" a good idea?: reply)
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Did you know 11:35 +396 AirshipJungleman29 talk contribs (→Queue 6 (3 August 00:00): Eschiva of Bures)
- diffhist Women in music 11:14 −1 Augnablik talk contribs (Did rewording and repositioning for better flow, and removed mention of birth years for consistency, because they weren't given for all women.) Tag: Visual edit
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Women in Music 11:02 +526 TarnishedPath talk contribs (Notifying of requested move using MovePlus)
- diffhist m Wikipedia talk:Did you know 10:58 +17 Theleekycauldron talk contribs (→Is the rejection of a nomination based on "hooks not perceived as interesting" a good idea?: ce) Tag: 2017 wikitext editor
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Did you know 10:58 +312 Theleekycauldron talk contribs (→Is the rejection of a nomination based on "hooks not perceived as interesting" a good idea?: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Did you know 10:48 +854 Narutolovehinata5 talk contribs (→Is the rejection of a nomination based on "hooks not perceived as interesting" a good idea?: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Did you know 10:45 +679 Gatoclass talk contribs (→Is the rejection of a nomination based on "hooks not perceived as interesting" a good idea?: reply airship)
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Did you know 10:44 +576 Soman talk contribs (→Is the rejection of a nomination based on "hooks not perceived as interesting" a good idea?: cmt)
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Did you know 10:41 +250 4meter4 talk contribs (→Is the rejection of a nomination based on "hooks not perceived as interesting" a good idea?: reply)
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Did you know 10:31 +470 AirshipJungleman29 talk contribs (→Is the rejection of a nomination based on "hooks not perceived as interesting" a good idea?: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Did you know 10:27 +218 Theleekycauldron talk contribs (→Is the rejection of a nomination based on "hooks not perceived as interesting" a good idea?: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Did you know 10:26 +96 4meter4 talk contribs (→Is the rejection of a nomination based on "hooks not perceived as interesting" a good idea?)