Related changes
Enter a page name to see changes on pages linked to or from that page. (To see members of a category, enter Category:Name of category). Changes to pages on your Watchlist are shown in bold with a green bullet. See more at Help:Related changes.
List of abbreviations (help):
- D
- Edit made at Wikidata
- r
- Edit flagged by ORES
- N
- New page
- m
- Minor edit
- b
- Bot edit
- (±123)
- Page byte size change
- Temporarily watched page
5 June 2025
- diffhist User talk:Mackensen 22:23 +200 Mackensen talk contribs (→GO Transit: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations 21:26 +237 Reverosie talk contribs (→ChristieBot: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations 19:56 +266 Mike Christie talk contribs (→ChristieBot: Reply)
- diffhist User talk:SandyGeorgia 19:47 −31 SandyGeorgia talk contribs (update)
- diffhist User talk:SandyGeorgia 19:46 −3,239 SandyGeorgia talk contribs (OneClickArchived "Sorry to hear" to User talk:SandyGeorgia/arch123)
- diffhist User talk:SandyGeorgia 19:46 −607 SandyGeorgia talk contribs (OneClickArchived "A barnstar for you!" to User talk:SandyGeorgia/arch123)
- diffhist User talk:SandyGeorgia 19:44 +638 SandyGeorgia talk contribs (→Sorry to hear: re)
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations 19:40 +296 Reverosie talk contribs (→ChristieBot: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations 19:36 +233 Reverosie talk contribs (→ChristieBot: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations 19:35 +383 Mike Christie talk contribs (→ChristieBot: Looks like it's working now)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Manual of Style 19:07 −45 SchreiberBike talk contribs (Undid revision 1294066003 by Artoria2e5 (talk) That is only a draft. If someone has the energy to move it forward, the encyclopedia would be better for it.) Tag: Undo
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations 18:29 +333 Reverosie talk contribs (→ChristieBot: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations 17:55 +407 Noleander talk contribs (→Should GA instructions be updated to state if trading GA reviews (quid pro quo) is permitted?: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist User talk:Mackensen 17:49 +423 Cards84664 talk contribs (New section)
- diffhist User talk:Pi.1415926535 17:48 +423 Cards84664 talk contribs (New section)
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations 16:50 +540 Mike Christie talk contribs (→ChristieBot: Reply)
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations 16:43 +142 AirshipJungleman29 talk contribs (→ChristieBot: ping)
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations 16:06 +489 Reverosie talk contribs (christiebot)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Manual of Style 10:57 +45 Artoria2e5 talk contribs (→Animals, plants, and other organisms: {{main|Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Organisms}}) Tag: Reverted
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations 10:50 +297 Billsmith60 talk contribs (→Readability of page: new section) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit New topic
- diffhist Wikipedia:Featured articles 09:58 +42 Ian Rose talk contribs (Add Thrilling Cities; Kitty Marion)
- diffhist m Module:Banner shell 09:18 −39 MSGJ talk contribs (add PageAssessment for PIQA, simplify some code, remove redundant class parameter tracking)
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations 07:37 +216 Chipmunkdavis talk contribs (→Should GA instructions be updated to state if trading GA reviews (quid pro quo) is permitted?: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations 07:20 +840 Premeditated Chaos talk contribs (→Should GA instructions be updated to state if trading GA reviews (quid pro quo) is permitted?: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations 06:39 +163 Chipmunkdavis talk contribs (→Should GA instructions be updated to state if trading GA reviews (quid pro quo) is permitted?: Not what I have argued)
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations 06:37 +246 Chipmunkdavis talk contribs (→Should GA instructions be updated to state if trading GA reviews (quid pro quo) is permitted?: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations 04:30 +579 Premeditated Chaos talk contribs (→Should GA instructions be updated to state if trading GA reviews (quid pro quo) is permitted?: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations 03:45 +299 Chipmunkdavis talk contribs (→Should GA instructions be updated to state if trading GA reviews (quid pro quo) is permitted?: Reply) Tag: Reply
4 June 2025
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations 22:52 +343 OlifanofmrTennant talk contribs (→New proposal: abolish the role of GARC coordinator: vote)
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations 20:27 +426 Premeditated Chaos talk contribs (→Should GA instructions be updated to state if trading GA reviews (quid pro quo) is permitted?: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations 20:14 +198 AirshipJungleman29 talk contribs (→Should GA instructions be updated to state if trading GA reviews (quid pro quo) is permitted?: seems fairly obvious to me)
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations 20:04 +258 Chipmunkdavis talk contribs (→Should GA instructions be updated to state if trading GA reviews (quid pro quo) is permitted?: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations 20:02 +403 Thebiguglyalien talk contribs (→Should GA instructions be updated to state if trading GA reviews (quid pro quo) is permitted?: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations 19:58 +352 Premeditated Chaos talk contribs (→Should GA instructions be updated to state if trading GA reviews (quid pro quo) is permitted?: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations 19:57 +226 Noleander talk contribs (→Should GA instructions be updated to state if trading GA reviews (quid pro quo) is permitted?: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations 19:57 +784 Chipmunkdavis talk contribs (→Should GA instructions be updated to state if trading GA reviews (quid pro quo) is permitted?: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations 19:47 +467 Chipmunkdavis talk contribs (→Should GA instructions be updated to state if trading GA reviews (quid pro quo) is permitted?: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist Wikipedia:Content assessment 19:32 +38 JuxtaposedJacob talk contribs (add link)
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations 19:18 +187 Kusma talk contribs (→Should GA instructions be updated to state if trading GA reviews (quid pro quo) is permitted?: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations 19:06 +32 Noleander talk contribs (→Should GA instructions be updated to state if trading GA reviews (quid pro quo) is permitted?)
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations 19:05 +1,177 Noleander talk contribs (→Should GA instructions be updated to state if trading GA reviews (quid pro quo) is permitted?: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist Wikipedia:Featured articles 16:06 +16 David Fuchs talk contribs (+ Mean (song))
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations 14:11 +1,000 Premeditated Chaos talk contribs (→Should GA instructions be updated to state if trading GA reviews (quid pro quo) is permitted?: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations 11:38 +445 IntentionallyDense talk contribs (→Should GA instructions be updated to state if trading GA reviews (quid pro quo) is permitted?: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist m Wikipedia:Good article criteria 10:56 +11 Kamenûk talk contribs
- diffhist m Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations 08:58 +37,875 Materialscientist talk contribs (Reverted edits by Hy5uyujjyhtyu7jy (talk) (HG) (3.4.13)) Tags: Huggle Rollback
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations 08:57 −37,875 Hy5uyujjyhtyu7jy talk contribs (←Replaced content with 'hi baddies cats are better than stupid sharty dogs. dogs disgustng sweat and spit get on you meanwhile cats like to be calm') Tags: Replaced Reverted
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations 06:56 −5 Chipmunkdavis talk contribs (→Should GA instructions be updated to state if trading GA reviews (quid pro quo) is permitted?: Actually I vaguely recall this coming up since)
- diffhist m Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations 06:56 +5 Chipmunkdavis talk contribs (→Should GA instructions be updated to state if trading GA reviews (quid pro quo) is permitted?: wording)
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations 06:55 +267 Chipmunkdavis talk contribs (→Should GA instructions be updated to state if trading GA reviews (quid pro quo) is permitted?: Reply) Tag: Reply