Related changes
Appearance
← Linones
Enter a page name to see changes on pages linked to or from that page. (To see members of a category, enter Category:Name of category). Changes to pages on your Watchlist are shown in bold with a green bullet. See more at Help:Related changes.
List of abbreviations (help):
- D
- Edit made at Wikidata
- r
- Edit flagged by ORES
- N
- New page
- m
- Minor edit
- b
- Bot edit
- (±123)
- Page byte size change
- Temporarily watched page
5 June 2025
- diffhist Charles the Younger 20:47 +17 Jim Dixon 55104 talk contribs (Updated short description) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit Android app edit App description change
- diffhist Charlemagne 20:45 +12 Jim Dixon 55104 talk contribs (Updated short description) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit Android app edit App description change
- diffhist Charlemagne 11:10 +10 Векочел talk contribs (removed Category:Founding monarchs; added Category:Founding monarchs in Europe using HotCat)
4 June 2025
- diffhist Carolingian Empire 23:24 −4 Srnec talk contribs (article uses Byzantine throughout) Tag: Undo
- diffhist Slavs 11:18 −19 Vipz talk contribs (Undid revision 1293870088 by Pinbagas (talk) adding up reliably sourced figures to get an unsourced total amounts to WP:SYNTH. Furthermore, please see the edit summary of Special:Diff/1104776791 and open a talk page discussion to discuss inclusion of a total number of Slavs in the infobox.) Tag: Undo
- diffhist m Carolingian Empire 11:16 +4 Artemiser32 talk contribs (→top: ERE is more appropriate for early middle ages than Byzantium) Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile app edit Android app edit App section source
- diffhist Slavs 04:00 +19 Pinbagas talk contribs (Why was it removed? I got that number by adding up the estimated numbers from the "population section". If the source was not reliable, the estimated numbers infobox in the "population section" table should also be removed.) Tags: Manual revert Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
3 June 2025
- diffhist Slavs 04:29 −19 Mellk talk contribs (Undid revision 1293553751 by Pinbagas (talk) where did you get this number from?) Tags: Undo Reverted
2 June 2025
- diffhist m Carolingian Empire 16:48 +4 Antiquary talk contribs (→Capitularies: +wl)
- diffhist Slavs 10:26 +19 Pinbagas talk contribs Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
1 June 2025
- diffhist Charlemagne 20:39 −45 Antiquary talk contribs (→External links: Rm cat. The theory that the Carolingians had Roman descent is controversial and isn't asserted in this article.)
- diffhist m Carolingian Empire 19:30 −27 Remsense talk contribs (Reverted 1 edit by Remsense (talk) to last revision by 2601:642:4F84:1590:5C4F:8905:6969:E45C) Tags: Twinkle Undo
- diffhist Carolingian Empire 19:16 +27 Remsense talk contribs (Reverted 1 edit by 2601:642:4F84:1590:5C4F:8905:6969:E45C (talk): The article lead summarizes the article body, not merely paraphrasing britannica. see WP:LEADCITE) Tags: Twinkle Undo Reverted
- diffhist Carolingian Empire 19:09 −27 2601:642:4f84:1590:5c4f:8905:6969:e45c talk (Britannica says nothing about "translatio" and the key events surrounding the coronation are not in dispute) Tag: Reverted
- diffhist Carolingian Empire 16:56 +70 Remsense talk contribs (Reverted 1 edit by 2601:642:4F84:1590:5C4F:8905:6969:E45C (talk): Right, back to what our sources actually say) Tags: Twinkle Undo
- diffhist Carolingian Empire 16:46 −70 2601:642:4f84:1590:5c4f:8905:6969:e45c talk (the crowning of Charlemagne was more practical than ideological) Tag: Reverted
- diffhist m Slavs 00:10 −16 Bruce1ee talk contribs (fixed lint errors – stripped tags)
31 May 2025
- diffhist Saxons 20:38 −3 Nyttend talk contribs (→Saxon raiders (3rd and 4th centuries): Revert https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=1260177579 — not a typo)
- diffhist Slavs 17:14 −251 DervotNum4 talk contribs (Tried my hand at restoring good edits) Tag: Visual edit: Switched
- diffhist Slavs 17:07 +551 DervotNum4 talk contribs (I've restored the page to a pre-QwertyZ34 version, they said on their talk page that they would revert there edits, which added AI generated citations, and read through them to see if they were reliable and accurate, I don't thinbk this has been done in any meaningful way as most of the sources they added still ether, linked to nothing, were for unreliable sources or didn't support the attached text) Tag: Visual edit