Related changes
Appearance
Enter a page name to see changes on pages linked to or from that page. (To see members of a category, enter Category:Name of category). Changes to pages on your Watchlist are shown in bold with a green bullet. See more at Help:Related changes.
List of abbreviations (help):
- D
- Edit made at Wikidata
- r
- Edit flagged by ORES
- N
- New page
- m
- Minor edit
- b
- Bot edit
- (±123)
- Page byte size change
- Temporarily watched page
19 May 2025
- diffhist m Material conditional 12:24 +32 Marc Schroeder talk contribs (removed lint error by setting fg=#000000)
- diffhist Material conditional 12:14 +672 Marc Schroeder talk contribs (added a precision on MPC / IPC)
18 May 2025
- diffhist Material conditional 14:54 +1,091 Marc Schroeder talk contribs (added ND proof of Peirce's law)
- diffhist Mathematics 09:11 +71 D.Lazard talk contribs (→Algebra: adding Moderne Algebra)
- diffhist Mathematics 04:26 −14 Finitefields talk contribs (Undid revision 1290945479 by Finitefields (talk). Referring to algebra as the art/study of manipulating formulas is used multiple times in the page, so I'm undoing and moving the discussion to the talk page.) Tag: Undo
- diffhist m Material conditional 04:16 −5 Marc Schroeder talk contribs (→Syntactical properties)
- diffhist m Material conditional 03:52 +4 Marc Schroeder talk contribs (→A selection of theorems (classical logic))
- diffhist Material conditional 03:19 +1,661 Marc Schroeder talk contribs (added two references and a ND proof)
- diffhist Mathematics 02:58 +14 Finitefields talk contribs ("The study of formulas and related structures" is a misrepresentation of algebra. The Wikipedia page for algebra itself does not use the word formula until paragraph 18.) Tags: Reverted Visual edit
17 May 2025
- diffhist Material conditional 21:09 +259 Marc Schroeder talk contribs (added alternative natural deduction rule to obtain classical logic)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Citing sources 19:26 +97 Beland talk contribs (→Citation style: add "Preserving the style of each individual source is not considered an acceptable consistent style." per Wikipedia talk:Citing sources#RFC on consistent styles and capitalization of titles)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Citing sources 12:52 −215 Kmhkmh talk contribs (nvm misread the scope of the change) Tag: Undo
- diffhist Wikipedia:Citing sources 12:42 +215 Kmhkmh talk contribs (still might be needed, see discussion) Tags: Undo Reverted
- diffhist Wikipedia:Citing sources 11:15 −215 Tamzin talk contribs (→Parenthetical referencing: been 5 years, probably don't need this line anymore) Tag: Reverted