Jump to content

Talk:Atari 8-bit computers

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A solid aluminum block?

[edit]

From the article:

To meet stringent FCC requirements, the early machines were completely enclosed in a solid cast aluminum block, which made them physically robust but expensive to produce.

Also, extremely difficult to operate, I would guess.

Is this poorly phrased, or just a bit of whimsy on a regular contributor's part?--NapoliRoma (talk) 23:54, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Noting that this has been addressed in several revisions over the years.--NapoliRoma (talk) 17:37, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox: CPU

[edit]

The main infobox of this article says "CPU: MOS Technology 6502B", which is just plain wrong for the XL/XE series, which used 6502C SALLY. Griggorio2 (talk) 23:52, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Successor?

[edit]

In the article Atari ST is mentioned as successor. But technically it was designed by another team and had inherited none of the design philosophy of 400/800. Also, the Atari company of 400/800 era and that of ST era - after Tramiel acquisition - was another company in reality.

Technically speaking, I consider the most appropriate candidate for 400/800 successor to be the Amiga platform. Designed by Jay Miner also, using the philosophy of different custom chips for graphics, audio, etc, in a specialized co-processor fashion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.4.245.121 (talk) 17:46, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rename to "Atari 8-bit computers"

[edit]

"Atari 8-bit family" is not a contemporaneous term, as mentioned in the article. That the word computer is omitted makes it sound like it includes 8-bit consoles, like the 2600, 5200, and 7800. "Atari home computers" was used prior to the Atari ST being released. "Atari 8-bit computers" has historical precedent and is the most obvious term.

I suspect "family" came from considering the Atari XEGS as a console, though it's just a 65XE in a different form factor. With 1400+ links to Atari 8-bit family, this is a far-reaching change, but it would be good to get rid of this invented "family" designation.

References:

  1. The Neverending Story manual, 1986
  2. ANALOG Computing, April 1986
  3. Atari Explorer, Summer 1987
  4. Antic, December 1988

Dgpop (talk) 21:02, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This issue was discussed already four years ago, and no one cared enough to oppose, so - I've just went with it. Let's see how it goes with the others.
There are other articles to be renamed, but I'll leave them for now. --Krótki (talk) 07:07, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Brilliant! I'll keep an eye on this! Dgpop (talk) 17:02, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is no reason to mention Byte's imaginary "trinity" in an Atari article.

[edit]

It is not hard to see the '77 "trinity" was actually just the Radio Shack MicroComputer System. Take a look at the Apple ][ price list from '77 and '78 and note the price of a mid-range system. Now look at the list price of a brand new '77 or '78 Toyota Corolla. See how the computer and the car cost about the same? Note that there were also very few programs avalable for the computer. Almost nobody was buying Apple computers to use at home in '77 or '78. Most machines were bought for use in schools. Apple sold about 7700 microcomputers for '77 and '78 where Radio Shack sold about 185,000. Radio Shack sold more microcomputers than all other manufacturers combined. Byte's "trinity" never existed and the fantasy article should never be quoted in a historical document. 2604:3D09:7A7D:50E0:C9E4:5DF4:B059:5EFF (talk) 22:39, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Atari_8-bit_computers&oldid=1285425429"