Talk:Typhlosion: Difference between revisions

Is this a Charizard Article?

This Typhlosion article is becoming Charizard-centric. It requires a cleanup.

Done. Hope it wasn't overkill. Bhamv 15:16, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

GA review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

This review is transcluded from Talk:Typhlosion/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Pokelego999 (talk · contribs) 23:16, 14 March 2025 (UTC)

Reviewer: Dracophyllum (talk · contribs) 00:24, 11 April 2025 (UTC)

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

I'll take this one. Comments to follow Dracophyllum 00:24, 11 April 2025 (UTC)

• 1a) I have basically no notes for prose, only that the ability Blaze is not mentioned in the article. Not notable I guess; I see Pikachu doesn't mention Static. Very well written and concise.
• 1b) Lede is a good summary, MOS fulfilled generally Y
• 2a) Ref layout is consistent and standard Y
• 2b) Lower quality sources acceptable for video-game article + scholarly article, RS good Y
• 2c) Spot-checking: Pass Y
  • ref 2: good
  • ref 7: good
  • ref 12: good (can be traded)
  • ref 18: good
  • ref 28: can't verify because Japanese machine translation is heinous, but gist looks good.
  • Summary of mostly positive reception is accurate, there is much defence for Typhlosion's non-canon story.
  • Bonus: https://www.academia.edu/download/81174265/le-vaillant_2020_pokefaves.pdf Lists typhlosion as a hedgehog?
• 2d) Earwig clean.
• 3a) Comparing to similar articles eg. Pikachu has similar sections and covers most needed info. Y
• 3b) Good level of detail; not Pokedex level eg.
• 4) Neutral stance on controversy, representing the facts and views accurately. Y
• 5) Very stable, despite high viewership (10k monthly) Y
• 6a) 2 non-free tagged images, at low res Y
• 6b) relevant pics of Typhlosion and variant Y

Review done @Pokelego999:. Dracophyllum 10:23, 12 April 2025 (UTC)

@Dracophyllum could you clarify what more needs to be done? I am uncertain what more needs to be accomplished before the article is passed. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 16:20, 13 April 2025 (UTC)

To be honest, nothing. Nice article, keep it up. Passing now. Dracophyllum 20:12, 13 April 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.