User talk:Mr.izadpanah: Difference between revisions

Your submission at Articles for creation: Afsaneh Salari (May 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Ratnahastin were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Afsaneh Salari and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ratnahastin (talk) 05:07, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Mr.izadpanah! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Ratnahastin (talk) 05:07, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

hello my friend. i changed my article about afsaneh salari, which i made for the cultural promotion of documentary production space in my country. It is true that I am familiar with this lady, but I do not benefit from her fame or her works. This is a movement that I have started to introduce to the people of the world (and then to the people of my own country with making their Farsi page) the Iranian documentary makers and filmmakers who are achieving many successes in Iran and outside Iran and have created good social and cultural works

So please, if you see these changes and check the references and see if it is good for a suitable article for Wikipedia or not. I would be grateful if you could help me improve day by day Mr.izadpanah (talk) 11:36, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

Problems with upload of File:Afsaneh-Salari-scaled.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Afsaneh-Salari-scaled.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:30, 29 June 2024 (UTC)

done Mr.izadpanah (talk) 09:16, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Afsaneh-Salari-scaled.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Afsaneh-Salari-scaled.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Salavat (talk) 09:16, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

done Mr.izadpanah (talk) 09:21, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Afsaneh-Salari-scaled.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Afsaneh-Salari-scaled.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 11:03, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

Hello, this page, Afsaneh Salari – Docmaniacs, doesn't make any claim about the copyright status of the image. Is this something you can request that Afsaneh Salari add to the page or ask her to submit permission via the permissions-en@wikimedia.org? Salavat (talk) 11:03, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

would you please help me for this? i took this image from docmaniancs website which afsaneh salari is one of its co-founders.

just this.

what kind of copyright tag do you suggest for this image Mr.izadpanah (talk) 14:09, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

Because the subject is still alive the the image will need a free license in order to be used on Wikipedia. At the moment however it doesn't look like there is any specific licensing for this image on the Docmaniacs website so you have to assume it is copyrighted. So, the best solution would be to contact Docmaniacs and ask them to publish the image under a free license. Details on how to do this are listed above. Salavat (talk) 14:39, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

i asked her to caption the copyright status of the image at the site.

is that ok? Mr.izadpanah (talk) 11:05, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

That will work, but could you ask her to specify a specific license in the caption, maybe a Creative Commons license like the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license? Or there are other free licenses can be seen on this page. That way we can apply that license template to the file. Salavat (talk) 15:12, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

what exactly she must write to specify a specific license in the caption?

write the exact caption then i will ask her to replace it with current caption Mr.izadpanah (talk) 11:03, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

My suggestion would be "Image licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license" or short form would be "Image licensed under CC-BY-SA-4.0". Salavat (talk) 14:45, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

done

thanks a lot for your contribution Mr.izadpanah (talk) 08:32, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

​@ Mr.izadpanah: I tried to get the Commons file restored at c:COM:REFUND#File:Afsaneh-Salari-scaled.jpg but it's not looking good. So, this image might not be totally in the free and clear just yet. You might want to comment in that Commons discussion to see what else is needed. Perhaps having the copyright holder email their c:COM:CONSENT will resolve things. If the Commons file doesn't get restored, this one should be nominated for deletion because Wikipedia shouldn't really be keeping (at least in my opinion) a local file that is identical to a file Commons is treating as a copyvio. -- Marchjuly (talk) 04:25, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Afsaneh-Salari.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Afsaneh-Salari.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 11:59, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

Hi Mr.izadpanah. Please ignore the template I added about the file lacking permission. Apparently, you've discussed this file above with Salavat and have sorted things out with their help. Instead of uploading the file locally to Wikipedia, though, it would have been much better for you to request the undeletion of c:File:Afsaneh-Salari.jpg per c:COM:REFUND since Commons is a much better location for content licensed this way. I've asked the Commons administrator who deleted the file per c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Afsaneh-Salari-scaled.jpg to take a look at the source url again and determine whether the Commons file can be undeleted. If that happens, the local file will longer be needed and the can be deleted. -- Marchjuly (talk) 12:24, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

Draftification of Afsaneh Salari

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, Afsaneh Salari, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it has been moved to Draft:Afsaneh Salari where you can continue to work on it. Please consider using the Article Wizard or the Articles for Creation procedure. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read "Your first article". You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 12:28, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

I've draftified this article because there's no clear indication that the subject satisfies Wikipedia:Notability (people) and also because you've declared that you've got a Wikipedia:Conflict of interest with the subject of the article. Moreover, a previous submitted draft for the article was rejected by a Articles for Creation (AfC) reviewer, and the most recent version doesn't seem to have satisfactorily addressed the issues cited by Ratnahastin, the reviewer who declined the draft. Given your delcared connection to the subject, you really shouldn't be moving the draft to the article namespace yourself but instead should continue working on it and then resubmit it to AFC for another review when you think its ready. If you try to move the draft to the article namespace yourself again, there's a really good chance that it will end up being nominated for deletion and subsequently end up deleted. So, please carefully read through the notability guideline for articles about people that I linked to above because it provides guidance as to what AfC reviewers are looking for when they review drafts for articles about living people. If you're unable to clearly establish that Salari meets that guideline, it will be hard for any draft written by anyone to survive a deletion challenge. For reference, there's no limitations placed on the number of times a draft can be submitted as long as you continue improving it and don't just keep re-submitting essentially the same declined version over and over again. -- Marchjuly (talk) 12:40, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

Dear contributor. Hello

Thank you very much for the time and effort you put into making Wikipedia better

The article I posted is about one of my compatriot artists and documentary makers who won awards in many domestic and foreign festivals, and I included some of his awards and works in the sources and linked them.

Other contributors also had edits on the article that I discussed with them and solved the problem, and regarding the points you mentioned, I had added new sources and improved the article a lot.

I have no financial relationship with this person and I am only interested in his work.

And over time, I am trying to improve the article I wrote and add the Persian language to it and create a Wikipedia article for the internal links of the article that are valuable, and for this I definitely need your help.

I have returned the article to the main space and I would be very grateful if you tell me if I need to make any changes

I am learning from you and other contributors and I would like you not to deprive me of your guidance.

Thank you very much and please don't move the article to draft and let's talk about it. Mr.izadpanah (talk) 08:09, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

Courtesy pinging @Marchjuly. Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 13:26, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

I asked an experienced Wikipedia administrator about this at User talk:Primefac#Afsaneh Salari. They (as I pointed out above) also feel that Salari's Wikipedia notability is unclear and that the article probably should be nominated for deletion. This is why I suggested that you not move the draft back to the article namespace due to your declared conflict of interest to the subject. One you did that, the only option left if Salari's Wikipedia notability can't be established is to nominate the article for deletion. If you're able to find significant coverage in WP:SECONDARY reliable sources about Salari (not about her one of her films but about her), then you should try to add them to the article; otherwise, the article continues to be at risk of being nominated for deletion. I've tried Googling for stuff about her, but the stuff showing up is typically not considered sufficient for establishing Wikipedia notability. I've also been asking for input from various WikiProjects, but there's been no responses yet. Perhaps she's received significant coverage in non-English sources? If she has, then they might help establish her Wikipedia notability as long as they're considered reliable sources. -- Marchjuly (talk) 11:59, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Afsaneh-Salari.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Afsaneh-Salari.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 21:55, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

I asked about this at WP:VRTN#File:Afsaneh-Salari.jpg and c:Commons:Undeletion requests#File:Afsaneh-Salari-scaled.jpg. It seems VRT verification is going to be needed from the photo's copyright holder for either Commons or Wikipeia to keep this file. If Ms. Salari is the copyright holder, please follow the guidance given in the above template and ask her to email VRT. If she's not the copyright holder, please ask her to ask the person who is to email VRT. Generally, it's the person that takes a photo, not the subject of the photo, who is considered the copyright holder. So, if Ms. Salari isn't the copyright holder of this photo and doesn't remember who is, she could simply take another photo herself and upload it to Commons or ask someone to take another photo of her and have them upload it to Commons. -- Marchjuly (talk) 22:01, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

she is the photo's copyright holder and i asked her to add copyright verification for this photo in its original place in her site which you can see (https://docmaniacs.com/afsaneh-salari/). it this enough? Mr.izadpanah (talk) 11:23, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

I pointed that out when asking to have the Commons file restored at c:COM:REFUND and also when I asked about the file at WP:VRTN, but further verification apparently needs to be emailed to Wikipedia VRT. -- Marchjuly (talk) 11:46, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

i'm not sure i understood what should i exactly do. please walk me through it so i can put an end to this problem and end this once and for all. thanks a lot Mr.izadpanah (talk) 07:16, 23 July 2024 (UTC)

The best way to resolve this would be to ask the copyright owner of the photo (whoever that is) to email their WP:CONSENT to Wikimedia VRT. If they do that, a VRT member will assess the emailer's claim of copyright ownership. If things check out, the VRT member will add the template {{Permission ticket}} to the file's page to let everyone know the copyright owners consent has been verified. If things don't check out, the VRT member will add the template {{Permission received}} to the file's page and most likely email back explaining what the problem is. The person who emails VRT should be (1) the copyright owner of the photo and (2) use some sort of official email address to help verify they're not someone pretending to be the copyright holder. -- Marchjuly (talk) 08:03, 23 July 2024 (UTC)

I don't think such a thing is possible. In my opinion, we should delete the photo and later we will find an image that satisfies the conditions of Wikipedia. thanks a lot Mr.izadpanah (talk) 09:01, 24 July 2024 (UTC)

If you were able to get the image's copyright holder to add a CC license to the website you're using as a source for the image, then they should also be able to send a WP:CONSENT email to Wikimedia VRT, shouldn't they? Anyway, if you don't think that's impossible, you can just do nothing and the file will most likely end up being deleted in a few days per WP:F11. If you want the file to be deleted asap, you can go to the file's page, click on "Edit" at the top of the page, and add the syntax {{db-g7}} (Template:db-g7) to the top of the editing window to request that the file be deleted per WP:G7. Once you've done that, you can click "Show preview" to check your work and then click on "Publish changes" if everything looks OK. Just make sure you leave an edit summary stating you uploaded the file but now want it to be deleted. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:28, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

Thank you very much for your cooperation and help

Considering that you are an expert in Wikipedia, can I ask a question? I wanted to see when the page I made will be indexed in Google? Mr.izadpanah (talk) 08:36, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

I'm not really an expert; I just perhaps know more about image licensing than you do. You should be able to find out more about Google indexing at Wikipedia:Controlling search engine indexing, but I believe it entirely depends on Google and it's not something that Wikipedia controls. You might want to ask about this at WP:HD or WP:MCQ if you still have questions. -- Marchjuly (talk) 09:37, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

Your COI ?

You declared that you've got a WP:COI with Salari on your user page and then you removed blanked it. If you have a COI with her, then you still have a COI regardless of whether you've removed said declaration from your userpage. The {{Reviewed}} template you tried to use seems specifically intended for WP:GA reviews, not general article reviews; moreover, even if you don't have a COI, you shouldn't be adding trying to "review" articles that you yourself have created. If you don't understand why doing such a thing is problematic, then perhaps you need to slow down and ask for assistance at either WP:HD or WP:THQ.

For reference, pretty much all newly created Wikipedia pages are, in principle, reviewed and assessed by the Wikipedia:New pages patrol. Even though these reviewers tend prioritize newly created articles over other pages, there are still way more articles being created than there are reviewers; so, it can sometimes take time for a new article to be reviewed. You just need to be patient and let the process run its course. Trying to speed things up only increases the chances of you running into trouble. -- Marchjuly (talk) 13:42, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

I'm sorry for that

I didn't intend to do anything wrong and I didn't want to do anything wrong. I was just checking this indexing issue that I asked you about and this review tag was about that, and thank you for saving me from the mistake. Mr.izadpanah (talk) 16:06, 28 July 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Oostamo

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Oostamo, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Fram (talk) 11:18, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

March 2025

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:

• Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
• State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
• Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.

Jimfbleak - talk to me? 11:30, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

---

Administrators: if this block includes a Volunteer Response Team ticket number, this block was placed as part of the conflict of interest VRT queue and the user must not be unblocked without the express consent of a user with access to the queue.

Request for Unblock – No Paid Editing, Understanding COI Guidelines

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mr.izadpanah (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I did not receive any payment for creating the article about OostaMo. My only intention was to introduce a business founded by an Iranian entrepreneur abroad. I now understand Wikipedia's guidelines on Conflict of Interest (COI) and will follow them in future edits. I request reconsideration of my block. Thank you. Mr.izadpanah (talk) 12:33, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You say you now understand WP:COI but don't actually address it. You need to exactly address your conflict of interest. Yamla (talk) 12:51, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mr.izadpanah (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hey, I understand why this block happened, but I want to clear up a misunderstanding. I didn’t get paid to write the OostaMo article, and I have no personal connection to the company. I just thought it was an interesting startup and wanted to add it to Wikipedia.

Looking back, I can see why my edits might have seemed promotional. That wasn’t my intention, but I get it now. I’ve read the COI guidelines more carefully, and if I get another chance, I’ll be more careful about neutrality and reliable sources.

I’d appreciate it if you could reconsider the block. I’m happy to contribute in other areas and follow Wikipedia’s policies properly. Thanks!

Just to clarify, I may sometimes use AI to help structure my messages for clarity, but I do not use AI to write Wikipedia articles. All my edits are made manually based on reliable sources. Mr.izadpanah (talk) 13:34, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

Decline reason:

If Afsaneh Salari is your mentor that means you have a close connection, which triggers the conflict of interest requirement. That means future edits should be edit requests on the article talk page. I am not sure if I believe you about not being paid, your explanation of knowing about the start up is vague. That said, I think an unblock is possible, if you agree to the conflict of interest requirements. PhilKnight (talk) 16:45, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You are free to make a new unblock request, but please don't modify (or remove) declined unblock requests for your currently active block. --Yamla (talk) 13:03, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

You've been warned about this. Do not do so again or you will lose access to your talk page. This is not optional, you are required to leave declined unblock requests in place unless and until the block is lifted. --Yamla (talk) 14:11, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

sorry about that

I didn't mean to erase any picse of data

Just wanted to make sure that my last request would be main one

Thank you for your attention Mr.izadpanah (talk) 15:21, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

(ec) "Startups" almost never merit Wikipedia articles; a company typically must become established and recognized in its field in order to draw the coverage necessary to merit a Wikipedia article(showing how it meets WP:ORG). Most reporting of startups consists of interviews or their routine activities(like the commencement of operations, the raising of capital, or the release of its main product) and not the significant coverage and analysis by independent reliable sources. How did you select this company to edit about, and not another? People rarely select the subjects of their edits at random, and you already have said you have a relationship with another subject of your editing.

You disclosed a COI with regards to Afsaneh Salari on your user page, and then you removed it a little more than an hour later and requested deletion of your user page. Why?

My suggestion would be to avoid using AI. We want to hear from you directly, and talk page posts are not expected to be grammatically and stylistically perfect. 331dot (talk) 14:19, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

thank you for you explanations

Ok I will never use AI ever again in wikipedia

And

I didn't know about what you said about startups. So that startup is not qualified to have a Wikipedia page and I get it

I didn't paid for making that page and now I know making wiki pages is not thing before reading and learning about wiki rules

So please unblock me Mr.izadpanah (talk) 15:19, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

You have not answered my question about conflict of interest- You disclosed a COI with regards to Afsaneh Salari on your user page, and then you removed it a little more than an hour later and requested deletion of your user page. Why? 331dot (talk) 17:46, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

You're right

But in that time I didn't know exactly what COI is And I mistakenly disclose this about afsaneh. Afsaneh is my mentor and a an artist of my homeland and I wanted to repay some of her efforts by making her wiki page. She has a relatively good resume as an Iranian woman filmmaker.

please let me know what should I do

Thanks a lot Mr.izadpanah (talk) 18:49, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

And also about what you said earlier " Mr.izadpanah (talk) 18:58, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

How did you select this company to edit about, and not another? People rarely select the subjects of their edits at random

I didnt choose oostamo randomly but it doesnt mean that I have paid. Mo ghaempanah is and Iranian euntropronor and know in startup community in Iran

But I realised that startups cannot have wiki pages. Mr.izadpanah (talk) 19:01, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

if you please give this a conclusion. let me what should i do to be unblocked and not blocked again. thanks a lot Mr.izadpanah (talk) 08:51, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Oostamo logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Oostamo logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Min☠︎rax^«¦talk¦» 14:33, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the Unblock Ticket Request System that have been declined leading to the posting of this notice.

Unblock

Unblocking, following UTRS appeal #101163. This is a conditional unblock with a topic ban from "Iran, broadly construed". To be clear, this includes topics like Iranian people, Persian history, etc.

@Mr.izadpanah, to answer your other question, WP:TEA is a good place to go with any questions you have about Wikipedia editing. -- asilvering (talk) 11:49, 12 March 2025 (UTC)