User talk:Lm6886: Difference between revisions

Lm6886, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Lm6886! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Worm That Turned (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! --Devokewater (talk) 16:15, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

June 2020

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Graham Linehan. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. — The Hand That Feeds You:^Bite 22:48, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

Graham Linehan came out as non binary on Twitter on June 12th. I updated Wikipedia to reflect these changes. Graham no longer goes by he/him pronouns, rather they/them pronouns instead. I believe it is right to accurately portray this on Wikipedia Lm6886 (talk) 23:39, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

Given his antipathy towards the LGBT community, no one believes him. Regardless, it is not an excuse to edit war. My notice was a courtesy, so you're aware of our rules & don't accidentally get in trouble. — The Hand That Feeds You:^Bite 17:21, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

March 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Philosophy Tube. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. — Bilorv (talk) 10:28, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Philosophy Tube, you may be blocked from editing. Equivamp - talk 21:05, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

By continuing on your current trajectory, you will be blocked from editing, with no other effect. There is precisely a 0% chance that making a change again and again without discussion will see that change stick. Consider that your desired version of the page can be completely correct, and yet wasting your own time to have no effect other than being blocked is not worthwhile. — Bilorv (talk) 22:17, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Philosophy Tube. Template:Z189 ~Gwennie🐈｟💬 📋｠ 01:16, 30 March 2021 (UTC)