User contributions for Thatwhichislearnt
Results for Thatwhichislearnt talk block log uploads logs global block log global account filter log
A user with 167 edits. Account created on 23 January 2024.
27 March 2024
- 12:1912:19, 27 March 2024 diff hist +306 Talk:Closed-form expression →Size of an expression is not a mathematical notion: Reply Tag: Reply
- 12:1712:17, 27 March 2024 diff hist +68 Closed-form expression Undid revision 1215837287 by D.Lazard (talk) Tags: Undo Reverted
- 12:1712:17, 27 March 2024 diff hist +532 Talk:Closed-form expression →Size of an expression is not a mathematical notion: Reply Tag: Reply
- 11:3911:39, 27 March 2024 diff hist +365 Talk:Closed-form expression →Size of an expression is not a mathematical notion
- 11:3011:30, 27 March 2024 diff hist +287 Talk:Closed-form expression →Size of an expression is not a mathematical notion
- 11:2311:23, 27 March 2024 diff hist +730 Talk:Closed-form expression →Size of an expression is not a mathematical notion: new section Tag: New topic
- 11:1511:15, 27 March 2024 diff hist +68 Closed-form expression Undid revision 1215831360 by D.Lazard (talk) Really. Size? Tags: Undo Reverted
- 10:4010:40, 27 March 2024 diff hist +68 Closed-form expression →Example: roots of polynomials: Removing imprecise terminology "size" introduced with a link to bogus original research. Tag: Reverted
25 March 2024
- 13:3513:35, 25 March 2024 diff hist +502 Talk:Function (mathematics) →Function evaluation: Reply Tag: Reply
- 01:3101:31, 25 March 2024 diff hist −5 Tangram →Number of configurations: Fixing erroneous explanation of what convex is.
24 March 2024
- 14:5014:50, 24 March 2024 diff hist +1,048 Talk:Function (mathematics) →Formal definition - the structure of a triple: Reply Tag: Reply
23 March 2024
- 11:3111:31, 23 March 2024 diff hist +740 Talk:Function (mathematics) →Total reset needed for this article: Reply Tag: Reply
22 March 2024
- 16:5616:56, 22 March 2024 diff hist +22 Function (mathematics) Undid revision 1214996233 by D.Lazard (talk) Reverting vandalism that removed tag and period ending sentence. Tags: Undo Reverted
- 13:1813:18, 22 March 2024 diff hist +5 Function (mathematics) Undid revision 1214874430 by D.Lazard (talk) Tag: Undo
18 March 2024
- 15:1915:19, 18 March 2024 diff hist +763 Talk:Function (mathematics) →Formal definition - why not use the literature?: Reply Tag: Reply
- 14:5414:54, 18 March 2024 diff hist +702 Talk:Function (mathematics) →Formal definition - why not use the literature?: Reply Tag: Reply
- 14:2114:21, 18 March 2024 diff hist +487 Talk:Function (mathematics) →Formal definition - why not use the literature?: Reply Tag: Reply
- 13:1713:17, 18 March 2024 diff hist +1,402 Talk:Function (mathematics) →Formal definition - why not use the literature?: Reply Tag: Reply
- 13:0413:04, 18 March 2024 diff hist +304 Talk:Function (mathematics) →Formal definition - why not use the literature?: Reply Tag: Reply
16 March 2024
- 19:5319:53, 16 March 2024 diff hist +522 Talk:Function (mathematics) →Formal definition - why not use the literature?: Reply Tag: Reply
- 19:3319:33, 16 March 2024 diff hist +208 Talk:Function (mathematics) →Formal definition - why not use the literature?: Reply Tag: Reply
- 18:3318:33, 16 March 2024 diff hist +1,415 Talk:Function (mathematics) →Formal definition - why not use the literature?: Reply Tag: Reply
15 March 2024
- 12:4912:49, 15 March 2024 diff hist +495 Talk:Function (mathematics) →Formal definition - why not use the literature?: Reply Tag: Reply
- 10:5310:53, 15 March 2024 diff hist +528 Talk:Function (mathematics) →Formal definition - why not use the literature?: Reply Tag: Reply
14 March 2024
- 23:1923:19, 14 March 2024 diff hist +1,156 Talk:Function (mathematics) →Formal definition - why not use the literature?: Reply Tag: Reply
- 21:1221:12, 14 March 2024 diff hist +599 Talk:Function (mathematics) →Formal definition - why not use the literature?: Reply Tag: Reply
- 21:0121:01, 14 March 2024 diff hist +362 Talk:Binary relation →The definition forgets what is trying to define.
- 20:5220:52, 14 March 2024 diff hist +878 Talk:Binary relation →The definition forgets what is trying to define.: new section Tag: New topic
- 20:3320:33, 14 March 2024 diff hist +7 Talk:Function (mathematics) →Formal definition - why not use the literature?
- 20:1920:19, 14 March 2024 diff hist +746 Talk:Function (mathematics) →Formal definition - why not use the literature?: Reply Tag: Reply
- 19:0319:03, 14 March 2024 diff hist +225 Talk:Binary relation →"Concepts" of relations are not subsets: Reply Tag: Reply
- 18:5318:53, 14 March 2024 diff hist +451 Talk:Binary relation →Total does not require codomain: new section Tag: New topic
- 18:2818:28, 14 March 2024 diff hist +692 Talk:Binary relation →"Concepts" of relations are not subsets: new section Tag: New topic
- 16:3216:32, 14 March 2024 diff hist +532 Talk:Function (mathematics) →A la Halmos "with codomain Y" while close to previous version
- 16:0916:09, 14 March 2024 diff hist +1,376 Talk:Function (mathematics) →A la Halmos "with codomain Y" while close to previous version: Reply Tag: Reply
- 15:5115:51, 14 March 2024 diff hist +671 Talk:Function (mathematics) →Whether X and Y are undefined: Reply Tag: Reply
- 15:2915:29, 14 March 2024 diff hist +297 Talk:Function (mathematics) →A la Halmos "with codomain Y" while close to previous version
- 15:2115:21, 14 March 2024 diff hist +1,241 Talk:Function (mathematics) →Whether X and Y are undefined: Reply Tag: Reply
- 15:0715:07, 14 March 2024 diff hist +2,759 Talk:Function (mathematics) →A la Halmos "with codomain Y" while close to previous version: new section Tag: New topic
- 14:5414:54, 14 March 2024 diff hist +266 User talk:Thatwhichislearnt →March 2024: Reply Tag: Reply
- 14:5214:52, 14 March 2024 diff hist +146 User talk:Thatwhichislearnt →March 2024: Reply Tag: Reply
- 14:5014:50, 14 March 2024 diff hist +796 Talk:Function (mathematics) →Whether X and Y are undefined: Reply Tag: Reply
- 14:4314:43, 14 March 2024 diff hist +344 User talk:Thatwhichislearnt →March 2024: Reply Tag: Reply
- 14:3814:38, 14 March 2024 diff hist +398 Talk:Function (mathematics) →Whether X and Y are undefined: Reply Tag: Reply
- 14:3614:36, 14 March 2024 diff hist +388 Function (mathematics) →Formal definition: Another go, addressing/dispelling the supposed concern. Tag: Reverted
- 14:1814:18, 14 March 2024 diff hist +201 Talk:Function (mathematics) →Whether X and Y are undefined: Reply Tag: Reply
- 14:1614:16, 14 March 2024 diff hist +483 Talk:Function (mathematics) →Whether X and Y are undefined: Reply Tag: Reply
- 14:1114:11, 14 March 2024 diff hist +399 Talk:Function (mathematics) →Whether X and Y are undefined: Reply Tag: Reply
- 14:0714:07, 14 March 2024 diff hist +470 User talk:Malparti →Revert in Functions (Mathematics)
- 14:0214:02, 14 March 2024 diff hist +248 User talk:Malparti →Revert in Functions (Mathematics)
