User contributions for Skeptical scientist
Results for Skeptical scientist talk block log uploads logs global block log global account filter log
A user with 645 edits. Account created on 8 June 2007.
28 May 2025
- 16:1716:17, 28 May 2025 diff hist +8 m Francesca Gino →Education and career: change "permanently joining harvard" to "joining harvard's permanent faculty" (since her tenure turned out to be less than permanent)
27 May 2025
- 21:0621:06, 27 May 2025 diff hist −9 Francesca Gino Slight reorganization of intro to group harvard's disciplinary actions and place in the logical progression: investigate, place on leave, fire.
8 April 2025
- 18:3418:34, 8 April 2025 diff hist +625 Talk:COVID-19 lab leak theory →French Academy of Medicine press release: Reply Tag: Reply
7 April 2025
- 22:2222:22, 7 April 2025 diff hist +3 m Talk:COVID-19 lab leak theory Missed a close paren
- 22:2122:21, 7 April 2025 diff hist +551 Talk:COVID-19 lab leak theory →French Academy of Medicine press release: add my own PoV
21 March 2025
- 22:5822:58, 21 March 2025 diff hist −99 m Talk:Starlink →Is Starlink profitable? Sources don't back that up.: - edited my comment (can check edit history if you care to see the change)
- 22:5622:56, 21 March 2025 diff hist +131 Starlink Failed verification / citation needed for Starlink's profitability.
- 22:5122:51, 21 March 2025 diff hist +1,399 Talk:Starlink →Is Starlink profitable? Sources don't back that up.: new section Tag: New topic
25 March 2024
- 23:3823:38, 25 March 2024 diff hist −22 Francesca Gino →Allegations of data fabrication: Remove {cn} tag as the linked retraction notices state the reasons for retraction.
16 March 2024
- 16:3316:33, 16 March 2024 diff hist −3 m Francesca Gino →Defamation lawsuit: fix external link formatting
- 16:3116:31, 16 March 2024 diff hist +104 Francesca Gino →Defamation lawsuit: link the unsealed report
- 16:2816:28, 16 March 2024 diff hist −27 Francesca Gino →Allegations of data fabrication: rewrite prefatory sentence introducing the list of retracted papers
- 16:2116:21, 16 March 2024 diff hist 0 m Francesca Gino →Allegations of data fabrication: hyphenate "since-retracted papers"
- 16:2016:20, 16 March 2024 diff hist −6 m Francesca Gino →Allegations of data fabrication: "were alleged to" -> "allegedly"
- 16:1916:19, 16 March 2024 diff hist −15 Francesca Gino →Allegations of data fabrication: Delete "by Data Colada" from "The papers that were alleged to contain fraudulent data were" since allegations were repeated by multiple sources (named in previous paragraphs)
- 16:1716:17, 16 March 2024 diff hist −95 m Francesca Gino →Allegations of data fabrication: collapse duplicate references
15 March 2024
- 20:4920:49, 15 March 2024 diff hist +393 Talk:Francesca Gino →Harvard's report on Gino's data fabrication has been released through court documents: Reply Tag: Reply
- 20:4720:47, 15 March 2024 diff hist +1,512 Francesca Gino →Allegations of data fabrication: Expand the material about Harvard's internal investigation with coverage of the actual released report in Science and The Harvard Crimson.
- 20:1520:15, 15 March 2024 diff hist +451 Talk:Francesca Gino →Harvard's report on Gino's data fabrication has been released through court documents: Reply Tag: Reply
- 19:1419:14, 15 March 2024 diff hist +459 Talk:Francesca Gino →Harvard's report on Gino's data fabrication has been released through court documents: new section Tag: New topic
2 February 2024
- 20:4420:44, 2 February 2024 diff hist +4 LiveRamp Wikilink data brokering
6 January 2024
- 00:4900:49, 6 January 2024 diff hist −272 Trump v. Anderson Just mention what the colorado supreme court held in the lede since it's too complicated with separate descriptions of the trial court and supreme court.
- 00:4500:45, 6 January 2024 diff hist +289 Trump v. Anderson Rewrite "the court held..." to specify which court held what, since there are now three different courts involved, and readers may be confused since the lede describes this as a SCOTUS case.
5 January 2024
- 23:3023:30, 5 January 2024 diff hist 0 Trump v. Anderson →External links: order the court opinion/order external links chronologically
- 23:2023:20, 5 January 2024 diff hist +252 Trump v. Anderson →U.S. Supreme Court: Add additional reference, directly citing the court's order itself. Tag: Reverted
- 23:1123:11, 5 January 2024 diff hist −1 m Trump v. Anderson Remove extra newline. Tag: Reverted
- 23:1023:10, 5 January 2024 diff hist +253 Trump v. Anderson Add a reference for SCOTUS granting a writ of certiorari (directly referencing the court's order itself). Tag: Reverted
- 23:0723:07, 5 January 2024 diff hist +132 Trump v. Anderson →External links: link to SCOTUS order granting certiorari
28 December 2023
- 00:2500:25, 28 December 2023 diff hist +285 Talk:Trump v. Anderson →Better link?: Reply Tag: Reply
- 00:2300:23, 28 December 2023 diff hist −72 m Trump v. Anderson →Works cited: directly cite the justice-department-hosted pdf of Trump's indictment and the court-hosted pdf of the Colorado supreme court opinion rather than mirrors hosted by newspapers.
- 00:0800:08, 28 December 2023 diff hist −666 Trump v. Anderson Remove "works cited" section as it's redundant with citations using reflist, which should be preferred. Tag: Reverted
27 December 2023
- 23:5623:56, 27 December 2023 diff hist +231 Talk:Trump v. Anderson →Who is Anderson?: Reply Tag: Reply
- 23:5323:53, 27 December 2023 diff hist +77 Trump v. Anderson →Colorado District Court: Add a mention of who Anderson is (since there was a question on the talk page).
2 November 2023
- 19:3019:30, 2 November 2023 diff hist −984 Francesca Gino Rewrite "Allegations of data fabrication" section to 1) include the role of Data Colada in originally uncovering the falsified data, and 2) list the four retracted papers at issue, with links to the retraction notices.
- 18:2418:24, 2 November 2023 diff hist +10 Francesca Gino Re-title "Response" section to "Defamation lawsuit" since this section is now just about her lawsuit, and doesn't include other elements of the "response" to allegations, such as the Harvard administrative leave.
24 June 2023
- 19:1219:12, 24 June 2023 diff hist +399 Talk:COVID-19 lab leak theory →Item 1 of consensus needs to be re-evaluated: Reply Tag: Reply
23 June 2023
- 17:4517:45, 23 June 2023 diff hist +287 Talk:COVID-19 lab leak theory add a PS
- 17:3917:39, 23 June 2023 diff hist +1,299 Talk:COVID-19 lab leak theory →What's the source for the claim - "most scientists believe the virus spilled into human populations through natural zoonosis": Reply Tag: Reply
- 15:4515:45, 23 June 2023 diff hist +1,262 Talk:COVID-19 lab leak theory →What's the source for the claim - "most scientists believe the virus spilled into human populations through natural zoonosis": Reply Tag: Reply
- 15:1615:16, 23 June 2023 diff hist +126 Talk:COVID-19 lab leak theory →My reverted edit on "Proposed scenarios": Reply Tag: Reply
22 June 2023
- 22:2022:20, 22 June 2023 diff hist 0 m COVID-19 lab leak theory →Proposed scenarios: Fix incorrect homonym usage (discrete vs. discreet).
- 22:1822:18, 22 June 2023 diff hist −100 m Talk:COVID-19 lab leak theory →My reverted edit on "Proposed scenarios": delete a phrase I meant to delete while editing my comment
- 22:1122:11, 22 June 2023 diff hist +1,296 Talk:COVID-19 lab leak theory →What's the source for the claim - "most scientists believe the virus spilled into human populations through natural zoonosis": Reply Tag: Reply
- 21:5021:50, 22 June 2023 diff hist +1,094 Talk:COVID-19 lab leak theory →My reverted edit on "Proposed scenarios": new section Tag: New topic
- 21:3121:31, 22 June 2023 diff hist −117 m Talk:COVID-19 lab leak theory consolidate two comments
- 21:3021:30, 22 June 2023 diff hist +737 Talk:COVID-19 lab leak theory →What's the source for the claim - "most scientists believe the virus spilled into human populations through natural zoonosis": Reply Tag: Reply
- 21:2421:24, 22 June 2023 diff hist +227 Talk:COVID-19 lab leak theory →What's the source for the claim - "most scientists believe the virus spilled into human populations through natural zoonosis": Reply Tag: Reply
- 19:5119:51, 22 June 2023 diff hist +17 COVID-19 lab leak theory →Proposed scenarios: - some of the scenarios involve carelessness of scientists doing virology research and not the government. Tag: Reverted
- 19:4419:44, 22 June 2023 diff hist +719 Talk:COVID-19 lab leak theory →What's the source for the claim - "most scientists believe the virus spilled into human populations through natural zoonosis": Reply Tag: Reply
- 06:3906:39, 22 June 2023 diff hist +4,395 COVID-19 lab leak theory I don't see how my well-cited using WP:RS sentence addition is "fringey". If this is a reference to WP:FRINGE, please let me know what makes you think this is inappropriate. Tags: Undo Reverted Disambiguation links added
