User contributions for Reflets.dans.l'eau

Search for contributionsshowhide

⧼contribs-top⧽

Username, IP address or CIDR range:

Namespace:

Invert selection

Associated namespace

Tag filter:

Invert selection

Only show edits that are latest revisions

Only show edits that are page creations

Hide minor edits

⧼contribs-date⧽

From date:

To date:

Show only edits pending review

Hide probably good edits

14:4914:49, 1 December 2018 diff hist +549 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →Ling.Nut: yes
13:2113:21, 1 December 2018 diff hist +278 User talk:Reflets.dans.l'eau →Question: r tks
09:3909:39, 1 December 2018 diff hist +99 Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2018-12-01/Recent research Volunteer Wikipedia editing is not a "legitimate" volunteer activity contributing e.g. to professional development.
09:3809:38, 1 December 2018 diff hist +948 N Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2018-12-01/Recent research Volunteer Wikipedia editing is not a "legitimate" volunteer activity contributing e.g. to professional development.
09:3009:30, 1 December 2018 diff hist +1 Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2018-12-01/From the editor +
09:2909:29, 1 December 2018 diff hist +47 Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2018-12-01/From the editor +
09:2809:28, 1 December 2018 diff hist +295 Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2018-12-01/From the editor +

07:0707:07, 26 November 2018 diff hist +138 User talk:Ceoil →You wanted me to edit/ I did.: ygm

02:1102:11, 19 November 2018 diff hist +391 Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured quality source review RfC +O. I have changed my mind. The problem here is "must be done first".
02:0902:09, 19 November 2018 diff hist +386 Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured quality source review RfC →Oppose alternative: +O. I have changed my mind. The problem here is "must be done first".

16:1316:13, 18 November 2018 diff hist +1,029 User talk:Iridescent →extraordinary claim raises doubts, see "scope under purview": r ec
15:1015:10, 18 November 2018 diff hist +24 User talk:Iridescent →extraordinary claim raises doubts, see "scope under purview": less intimidating, not more
15:0415:04, 18 November 2018 diff hist +2,658 User talk:Iridescent →extraordinary claim raises doubts, see "scope under purview": less intimidating, not more
07:2507:25, 18 November 2018 diff hist +221 User talk:Iridescent →extraordinary claim raises doubts, see "scope under purview": new section
07:1607:16, 18 November 2018 diff hist +125 Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured quality source review RfC the scope under purview of FAC is too large. fac is not a test of article quality; it is a test of reviewer good fait
07:0107:01, 18 November 2018 diff hist +5 N User:Reflets.dans.l'eau hello current
07:0007:00, 18 November 2018 diff hist +247 User talk:Ceoil →You wanted me to edit/ I did.: new section
06:5906:59, 18 November 2018 diff hist +278 Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured quality source review RfC FAC is NOT a test of article quality; it is a test of reviewer good faith.
06:4106:41, 18 November 2018 diff hist +144 Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured quality source review RfC very strong support
06:4006:40, 18 November 2018 diff hist +40 Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured quality source review RfC very strong support
06:3506:35, 18 November 2018 diff hist +1,117 Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured quality source review RfC →Poll for initial RfC: yes yes very Strong Support

1 December 2018

26 November 2018

19 November 2018

18 November 2018