User contributions for Paddykumar
Appearance
Results for Paddykumar talk block log uploads logs global block log global account filter log
A user with 177 edits. Account created on 22 May 2019.
25 March 2023
- 13:3613:36, 25 March 2023 diff hist +161 User talk:Paddykumar →Blocked: Reply Tag: Reply
- 10:4910:49, 25 March 2023 diff hist +288 User talk:Paddykumar →Blocked: Reply Tags: Reverted Reply
19 January 2023
- 23:3723:37, 19 January 2023 diff hist +243 User talk:Paddykumar →Blocked: Reply Tag: Reply
- 21:3021:30, 19 January 2023 diff hist +239 User talk:Paddykumar →Blocked: Reply Tag: Reply
- 19:2519:25, 19 January 2023 diff hist +437 Kellie-Jay Keen-Minshull Complaint from Keen to Wiki Tag: Reverted
1 January 2023
- 22:0922:09, 1 January 2023 diff hist +1,462 Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard →Kellie-Jay Keen-Minshull: Reply Tags: Reverted Reply
- 08:1908:19, 1 January 2023 diff hist +2,482 Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard →Kellie-Jay Keen-Minshull: Reply Tag: Reply
31 December 2022
- 09:2209:22, 31 December 2022 diff hist +1,071 Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard →Kellie-Jay Keen-Minshull: new section Tag: Disambiguation links added
29 December 2022
- 18:5618:56, 29 December 2022 diff hist +745 Kellie-Jay Keen-Minshull Undid revision Rubbish! This article is totally biased against Keen The Mridul Wadhwa section is just one example Saying Wadhwa, a man, should NOT run the rape crisis centre is a valid criticism because of the status of the female clients, and the validity of this criticism is recognized in UK law. It is not bigotry. I will not submit to compelled speech or compelled writing. I will call a man, a man and use "he" and "him". Tag: Undo
- 17:2217:22, 29 December 2022 diff hist +745 Kellie-Jay Keen-Minshull Undid revision 1130319564 by It is backed up by "surely this role should have been explicitly [cisgender] women-only" Objecting to a man in this role is entirely legitimate, and backed up by the Equality Act 2010 exemptions. Keen's point is, what is in the interests of women? It is not a question of attacking Mridul Wadhwa for the sake of it. If this can be better written according to the rules of Wiki, fine, be my guest. Tags: Undo Reverted
- 16:0416:04, 29 December 2022 diff hist +745 Kellie-Jay Keen-Minshull This text shows what the criticism is and further that this is recognized in the Equality Act 2010. Tag: Reverted
- 13:4313:43, 29 December 2022 diff hist +248 Kellie-Jay Keen-Minshull Undid revision. It is needed as it shows the purpose of the protest. Protecting women's single sex spaces, in this instance locker rooms. Tags: Undo Reverted
- 13:1513:15, 29 December 2022 diff hist +189 Kellie-Jay Keen-Minshull Additional text on Lia Williams Tag: Reverted
- 10:4210:42, 29 December 2022 diff hist +257 Kellie-Jay Keen-Minshull Lia Williams and other swimmers' dignity.
- 09:1809:18, 29 December 2022 diff hist −351 Kellie-Jay Keen-Minshull The Open Democracy article claims Keen Parker made a series of unfounded and unevidenced accusations about Wadhwa and her work in the video, but none are detailed. Therefore this is not verified. Plus small amendments Tag: Reverted
- 09:0209:02, 29 December 2022 diff hist +695 Kellie-Jay Keen-Minshull Mridul Wadhwa and Edinburgh Rape Crisis Tag: Reverted
28 December 2022
- 16:5216:52, 28 December 2022 diff hist −8 m Kellie-Jay Keen-Minshull Standing for Women Wiki page does not exist. Hence links to non-existent page removed
- 15:4415:44, 28 December 2022 diff hist +279 Kellie-Jay Keen-Minshull More info on confrontation with Dawn Ennis.
- 15:2515:25, 28 December 2022 diff hist +4 Kellie-Jay Keen-Minshull Undid revision. That is conjecture, but what is VERIFIABLE is what is on the SFW Facebook page. " About: This campaign is to focus specifically on the word woman and other female language that clearly defines women and our rights." People can disagree with her, but this statement shows the aim of the campaign. Tags: Undo Reverted
- 13:3213:32, 28 December 2022 diff hist −196 Kellie-Jay Keen-Minshull Undid revision What weight does one selfie have? How is Edgar J. Delatorre or the Proud Boys or the Jan 6 Capitol attack relevant to Keen? Tags: Undo Reverted
- 11:4911:49, 28 December 2022 diff hist +4 Kellie-Jay Keen-Minshull Women's rights activism. Tag: Reverted
- 11:4611:46, 28 December 2022 diff hist −196 Kellie-Jay Keen-Minshull Undid revision "The phrase "the threshold for inclusion is verifiability, not truth" meant that verifiability is a necessary condition (a minimum requirement) for the inclusion of material, though it is not a sufficient condition (it may not be enough)." This is WP:UNDUE. Aside from one selfie, Keen has nothing to do with Edgar J. Delatorre, the Proud Boys or the Jan 6 Capitol attack. Tags: Undo Reverted
- 09:3509:35, 28 December 2022 diff hist +15 m Kellie-Jay Keen-Minshull Link to Emma Nicholson
- 09:3009:30, 28 December 2022 diff hist +300 Kellie-Jay Keen-Minshull Emma Nicholson.
- 08:5708:57, 28 December 2022 diff hist −196 Kellie-Jay Keen-Minshull Removed Edgar J. Delatorre as WP:UNDUE. Did she know who Edgar J. Delatorre was when he took the selfie? She is from Wiltshire, England. Do most Americans don't know who he is?
- 06:3506:35, 28 December 2022 diff hist −398 Kellie-Jay Keen-Minshull Undid revision 1129943523 WP:UNDUE. What part did Hearts of Oak play in the rally? Were they invited to attend? Did any reps speak? Did they have anything to do with the organization? Tag: Undo
- 06:1406:14, 28 December 2022 diff hist +807 Talk:Kellie-Jay Keen-Minshull →Tommy Robinson: new section Tag: New topic
27 December 2022
- 12:3612:36, 27 December 2022 diff hist −265 Kellie-Jay Keen-Minshull Undid revision 1129755795 by Source 1: Asking for evidence is not an endorsement. Source 2:Tweet. Supposed context is given in reply, so we don't know what the original tweet was in respect of. Source 3: Not my OR www.feministcurrent.com is attached to tweet. Criticism of media is "Why is this insignificant man given such significance?" But also she says, "mouthy yob","probably racist" and "opportunist". There really isn't anything giving "support" or "praise" to TR. Tag: Undo
26 December 2022
- 21:3021:30, 26 December 2022 diff hist −265 Kellie-Jay Keen-Minshull Undid revision. I can see a reply tweet from "Katie" saying "TERF Posie Parker enraged that her mate, far-right EDL Fuhrer Tommy Robinson, has been arrested by polices for incitement to racial hatred." But the PP original tweet does not mention TR. In the podcast I did not hear "he's not that bad". I did hear her say "mouthy yob","probably racist" and "opportunist". I cannot see evidence for "expressed support for" and "repeatedly praised."the text Tags: Undo Reverted
- 19:1819:18, 26 December 2022 diff hist +198 Kellie-Jay Keen-Minshull Puberty blockers and cross sex hormones
- 17:0017:00, 26 December 2022 diff hist −265 Kellie-Jay Keen-Minshull I cannot see proof of support for Tommy Robinson. In www.feministcurrent.com/2019/01/24/podcast-posie-parker-standing-for-women/ which seems to be a source, Keen says of Robinson that he is "probably racist" and and "opportunist". Tag: Reverted
16 December 2022
- 16:4416:44, 16 December 2022 diff hist +2 m Doug Barrowman Corrected word
8 December 2022
- 15:1015:10, 8 December 2022 diff hist +275 David Meller PPE contract
2 December 2022
- 13:5513:55, 2 December 2022 diff hist +303 Mermaids (charity) Charity Commission Inquiry now statutory
1 December 2022
- 16:5416:54, 1 December 2022 diff hist +435 Mermaids (charity) Undid revision 1124952298 WP:ONUS means the item should be included. The charity is under scrutiny for a number of reasons, including this one. The "right-leaning British press" is not relevant. Safeguarding should be considered when recruiting to a children's charity. That is why this item is important. It raises questions about whether the charity is well run. WP:NPOV would arise with NOT including this item. Tags: Undo Reverted
25 November 2022
- 21:2321:23, 25 November 2022 diff hist +117 Mermaids (charity) Susie Green has left CEO position
24 October 2022
- 18:0818:08, 24 October 2022 diff hist +8 Mermaids (charity) Changed "trainings" to "training sessions"
13 October 2022
- 09:2209:22, 13 October 2022 diff hist +30 Unboxed: Creativity in the UK Clarified it was the DCMS select committee that asked for an invesigation
12 October 2022
- 23:1723:17, 12 October 2022 diff hist +270 Talk:Mermaids (charity) →Discussion on "rude images" reported by The Times: Reply Tag: Reply
- 21:1321:13, 12 October 2022 diff hist +303 Talk:Mermaids (charity) →Discussion on "rude images" reported by The Times: Reply Tag: Reply
- 20:4620:46, 12 October 2022 diff hist +573 Talk:Mermaids (charity) →Discussion on "rude images" reported by The Times: Reply Tag: Reply
- 19:5919:59, 12 October 2022 diff hist +307 Mermaids (charity) Undid revision 1115704834 by Maddy from Celeste Is "explicit" better than "rude"? Explicit appears in headline. Tag: Reverted
- 19:4619:46, 12 October 2022 diff hist +303 Mermaids (charity) Undid revision himself changed to themselves. Very wp:due actually as this is one of the three news stories involving Mermaids at the mo: binders, trustee and this one. All three mentioned in Miriam Cates' question to Liz Truss the Prime Minister. Tag: Reverted
- 18:4118:41, 12 October 2022 diff hist +301 Mermaids (charity) Undid revision. Clearly relevant to Mermaids as it was raised by Miriam Cates in her question to Liz Truss at PMQs when asking for police investigation. Neither sex nor gender of the employee is mentioned in text so I cannot see where MOS:Genderid applies. If heading is not appropriate, please amend Tags: Undo Reverted
- 18:0718:07, 12 October 2022 diff hist +301 Mermaids (charity) Times story Tag: Reverted
- 17:5017:50, 12 October 2022 diff hist +4 m Mermaids (charity) Link to Miriam Cates
- 17:4817:48, 12 October 2022 diff hist +207 Mermaids (charity) Miriam Cates's question to Liz Truss at PMQs
8 October 2022
- 11:3311:33, 8 October 2022 diff hist +537 Good Law Project GLP loses Abingdon Health case
7 October 2022
- 19:2219:22, 7 October 2022 diff hist +317 Good Law Project LGB Alliance case
- 15:2315:23, 7 October 2022 diff hist +207 Abingdon Health Result of Judicial Review. Contracts found to be lawful. Good Law Project lost.