User contributions for Mostly Translucent

4 November 2018

• 23:5823:58, 4 November 2018 diff hist 0 Rejuvenation Research No edit summary

10 December 2016

• 14:3214:32, 10 December 2016 diff hist −247 Rejuvenation Research Removed unnecessary, biased historical bit by a random popular magazine writer. This has no place in a Wikipedia article about a reputable scientific journal.

4 December 2016

• 15:2215:22, 4 December 2016 diff hist −247 Rejuvenation Research No edit summary

22 April 2015

• 01:5701:57, 22 April 2015 diff hist −604 Rejuvenation Research →History: What is the utility in including sources over a decade old? These two divergent appreciations from 2004 and 2005 do little to convey the current appreciation of the journal in 2015.

2 April 2015

• 12:2512:25, 2 April 2015 diff hist −252 Rejuvenation Research Undid revision 651825860 by Randykitty (talk) That is not clear from the context of the use "somewhat fringy". The author offers no explanation for this comment in his 2005 article.

17 March 2015

• 20:0420:04, 17 March 2015 diff hist −252 Rejuvenation Research Rejuvenation-type research is not controversial. See the 2014 scientific publication entitled " Vascular and neurogenic rejuvenation of the aging mouse brain by young systemic factors"

29 January 2015

• 21:4121:41, 29 January 2015 diff hist −251 Rejuvenation Research I removed the commentary from the Popular Science article, per rejuvenation not being a fringe field. Something is not fringe if it has been proven to be possible and is accepted and encouraged by the scientific community. See Talk page for more details.
• 21:3721:37, 29 January 2015 diff hist +1,814 Talk:Rejuvenation Research The 2005 comment from Popular Science should be removed.

22 December 2014

• 14:3114:31, 22 December 2014 diff hist −604 Rejuvenation Research Undid revision 639106955 by Randykitty (talk) Please see the article discussed on the Talk page.

21 December 2014

• 14:5414:54, 21 December 2014 diff hist −604 Rejuvenation Research 2005 commentary has been removed. Please see the 2008 article I share and discuss on the Talk page.
• 14:5314:53, 21 December 2014 diff hist +3,252 Talk:Rejuvenation Research Article discussing the evolution of the anti-aging science movement quoted as justification for the removal of 2005 commentary.

2 November 2014

• 15:0215:02, 2 November 2014 diff hist 0 Molecular Vision Updated impact factor.

27 October 2014

• 21:1321:13, 27 October 2014 diff hist −5 Rejuvenation Research →History: Removed "been"
• 21:1321:13, 27 October 2014 diff hist 0 Rejuvenation Research →History: 2008 should be 2005, per the sources being from 2005.

25 October 2014

• 14:2014:20, 25 October 2014 diff hist +41 m Qashoqtarash Mahalleh Minor grammatical changes.
• 14:1314:13, 25 October 2014 diff hist +142 m Life extension →Genetic modification: Included comment regarding genetic modifications in model organisms conferring life extension.

23 October 2014

• 15:0715:07, 23 October 2014 diff hist +294 Life extension →Genetic modification: Included references.
• 14:5714:57, 23 October 2014 diff hist +410 Life extension →Public opinion: Inclusion of cited commentary on the Pew poll.
• 14:5014:50, 23 October 2014 diff hist +411 Life extension →Genetic modification: Included information for record life extension increases in mice and nematodes.

22 October 2014

• 14:2914:29, 22 October 2014 diff hist +46 Rejuvenation Research It should be made clear that it is not a scientist who is making the statement "somewhat fringy". This is a 2005 reference from a popular science writer. Just saying "somewhat fringy" implies scientific expertise which the source writer lacks.
• 13:3113:31, 22 October 2014 diff hist +4 m Life extension Clarified certain sponges and corals versus all sponges and corals.

19 October 2014

• 16:5816:58, 19 October 2014 diff hist +295 m Life extension →Public opinion: Expounded the Pew Research Poll data.
• 13:2813:28, 19 October 2014 diff hist −1 m Rejuvenation Research Removed unnecessary space.

18 October 2014

• 20:3620:36, 18 October 2014 diff hist +212 Life extension Undid revision 630151216 by Mostly Translucent (talk) Accidentally undid my own addition.
• 20:3520:35, 18 October 2014 diff hist −212 Life extension Quoted from the reference I included (a paper published in Ageing Research Reviews): "Basal metazoans like sponges, jellyfish, corals and hydras often show great longevity and potential immortality."
• 20:3420:34, 18 October 2014 diff hist +212 Life extension Quoted from the reference I included (a paper published in Ageing Research Reviews): "Basal metazoans like sponges, jellyfish, corals and hydras often show great longevity and potential immortality."
• 20:1620:16, 18 October 2014 diff hist +16 m Life extension It's the claims of salesmen in industry that have been criticized, not anti-aging medicine advocates. The use of this term is misleading. Anyone who supports research into ways to remove or slow bad effects from aging is an "anti-aging medicine advocate".
• 20:1220:12, 18 October 2014 diff hist +23 m Life extension Regenerative medicine is also a major source for current and theoretical rejuvenative therapies.
• 19:5719:57, 18 October 2014 diff hist 0 Rejuvenation Research →History: Changed 2008 to 2005.
• 19:5619:56, 18 October 2014 diff hist −1 m Rejuvenation Research Removed unnecessary space.
• 19:5619:56, 18 October 2014 diff hist −257 Rejuvenation Research Removed 2005 commentary. Research on "rejuvenation" and "biogerontology" is not fringy in 2014. Perusal of awarded National Institute on Aging (NIA) grants (http://projectreporter.nih.gov/reporter.cfm) show many grants specifically research these themes.

11 August 2014

• 00:4900:49, 11 August 2014 diff hist +17 Life extension Pharmaceutical modulation is also a major candidate for life extension therapies.

5 August 2014

• 14:4414:44, 5 August 2014 diff hist +2 Rejuvenation Research Updating impact factor.

9 July 2014

• 19:5019:50, 9 July 2014 diff hist −419 Rejuvenation Research Removed one source. Reasons: Outdated and ultimately sourced to an editorial written by the previous editor Michael Fossel under the previous journal name. See talk page.
• 19:4919:49, 9 July 2014 diff hist +2,067 Talk:Rejuvenation Research Justification for removal of one source.~~~~

2 July 2014

• 20:2520:25, 2 July 2014 diff hist −48 Israel "many of them stone-throwing Palestinian youths" is an unnecessary addition to the sentence that introduces bias. Unless the demographics of those killed (either Palestinian or Israeli) are consistently included, the inclusion here seems biased.

27 January 2014

• 17:1517:15, 27 January 2014 diff hist −1 Rejuvenation Research Inserted missing quotation mark.
• 17:1417:14, 27 January 2014 diff hist +12 Rejuvenation Research Included date (2008) for journal appreciations.
• 17:1317:13, 27 January 2014 diff hist −81 Rejuvenation Research Fixed reference link.
• 17:0817:08, 27 January 2014 diff hist +736 Rejuvenation Research →History: Included quote from published anthropology dissertation in USC Library.

24 January 2014

• 15:1815:18, 24 January 2014 diff hist +56 N User:Mostly Translucent ←Created page with '{{template:User Scientist}} {{template:User degree/PhD}}' current
• 14:0314:03, 24 January 2014 diff hist −743 Israel Undid revision 592125336 by Calton (talk) Again, the citations included do not justify this comment. Different, more convincing citations are required.
• 04:0404:04, 24 January 2014 diff hist −743 Israel →Israeli-occupied territories: The comment "he Gaza Strip and the West Bank are seen by the Palestinians and most of the international community as the site of a future Palestinian state" is not justified with the citations included.
• 03:5303:53, 24 January 2014 diff hist −132 Life extension →Average and maximum lifespans: Added citation and edited sentence for why different animals might age differently. Also removed the comment about telomere length, as telomere length/telomerase activity does not correlate with lifespan.
• 02:3702:37, 24 January 2014 diff hist +324 Life extension →Public opinion: Added rebuttal to overpopulation concern by Max More, with citation.
• 02:1102:11, 24 January 2014 diff hist +92 Life extension →Public opinion: Provided a citation for the comment on overpopulation and removed word "many" as I was unable to find statistics on the number of people who feared overpopulation and effects on society.
• 01:5801:58, 24 January 2014 diff hist +76 Life extension →Average and maximum lifespans: Without manipulation, the average maximum lifespan of a mouse is about 3 years. A citation is included for this.
• 01:3501:35, 24 January 2014 diff hist +37 m Life extension →Public opinion: Citation needed for the comment "many people oppose it due to fear of overpopulation"

23 January 2014

• 19:3019:30, 23 January 2014 diff hist +975 Talk:Rejuvenation Research →Sources and Commentary: Response to Randykitty.

22 January 2014

• 20:4120:41, 22 January 2014 diff hist +338 Life extension →Genetic modification: Added citations for comment about other genetic modifications reported to extend lifespan in model organisms.