Jump to content

User contributions for Gravitationpull

Results for Gravitationpull talk block log uploads logs global block log global account filter log
A user with 73 edits. Account created on 14 November 2014.
Search for contributionsshowhide
⧼contribs-top⧽
⧼contribs-date⧽
(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

28 April 2025

12 February 2024

3 October 2023

  • 16:2316:23, 3 October 2023 diff hist +642 Shahrar Ali Undid revision 1178384960 by Bondegezou (talk) Agreed do not edit war, take this to talk. I think it is down to Ralbegen to discuss if they want without imposing unnecessary burden upon good faith contributors about what is clearly well-sourced content. Their objections are petty and arbitrary. If one doesn't like the paraphrase by all means improve quality with better paraphrase or quite marks but wholesale delete not reasonable. Tags: Undo Reverted

2 October 2023

  • 22:5422:54, 2 October 2023 diff hist +642 Shahrar Ali Undid revision 1178282297 by Ralbegen (talk). Feel free to discuss but please don't delete contributors' work meantime. You've offered nothing but subjective, shifting interpretations to justify wholesale deletion of text. Paraphrased text from decent sources is not hearsay or fabricated content. Tags: Undo Reverted
  • 00:0200:02, 2 October 2023 diff hist +642 Shahrar Ali Undid revision 1178084102 by Ralbegen (talk). Don't accept your reasons, which appear to change every time. There's a place for paraphrase with or without quotation, and references were included. Tags: Undo Reverted

1 October 2023

  • 00:5200:52, 1 October 2023 diff hist +20 Shahrar Ali Undid revision 1177975656 by Bondegezou (talk). Was just fine as it was as it is a distinct section and benefits from separation not mixing together with previous section. Tag: Undo
  • 00:4500:45, 1 October 2023 diff hist +1,298 Shahrar Ali Undid revision 1177983987 by Ralbegen (talk). Plenty of primary sources on significance of this legal case that would justify a modest section such ss this. Note previous mistake made by Ralbegen about the case not being about gender critical discrimination, which other sources have confirmed so it seems R has limited knowledge of this area of UK politics or law. Seems v petty to want to remove proportionate, factual content like this. Tag: Undo

30 September 2023

6 August 2023

5 August 2023

  • 02:0602:06, 5 August 2023 diff hist −13 m Shahrar Ali Removed qualification "so-called" and scare quotes around gender critical as this is now a legally accepted term. Tag: Reverted
  • 01:5901:59, 5 August 2023 diff hist −25 Shahrar Ali Undid revision 1162240831 by Dylnuge (talk) No, original faithfully reported what Ali's litigation was about, alleged discrimination based on gender critical belief under the Equality Act. That's literally what's being alleged. Previous edit completely inaccurate & misrepresentative of what he is alleging. Tags: Undo Reverted

23 October 2022

26 August 2021

25 August 2021

22 August 2021

21 August 2021

10 August 2021

  • 21:5521:55, 10 August 2021 diff hist +2 m Shahrar Ali Reposition of election result for 2020.
  • 21:5321:53, 10 August 2021 diff hist +70 m Shahrar Ali Add result for 2020 leadership election.
  • 21:4221:42, 10 August 2021 diff hist +25 m Shahrar Ali Berry's disatisfaction with Ali's appointment has been widely cited as the most reasonable interpretation of her resignation statement and despite ample opportunity to deny this, she has not done so. She made reference to a person without naming them, as has been picked up by all three sources cited here. This minor edit corrects for over charitable interpretation.

30 August 2020

17 November 2019

16 November 2019

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Gravitationpull"