User contributions for Dustinscottc

Search for contributionsshowhide

⧼contribs-top⧽

Username, IP address or CIDR range:

Namespace:

Invert selection

Associated namespace

Tag filter:

Invert selection

Only show edits that are latest revisions

Only show edits that are page creations

Hide minor edits

⧼contribs-date⧽

From date:

To date:

Show only edits pending review

Hide probably good edits

20:3320:33, 23 July 2025 diff hist +394 Paramount Global →Merger with Skydance Media

16:2016:20, 7 July 2025 diff hist +1,312 Talk:United States v. Skrmetti →Amicus: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit App talk reply

00:4300:43, 2 July 2025 diff hist +481 Talk:United States v. Skrmetti →Amicus: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit App talk reply

20:1120:11, 1 July 2025 diff hist −1 United States v. Skrmetti Minor correction to previous edit, which added information regarding Alabama’s amicus brief.
20:0920:09, 1 July 2025 diff hist +1,340 United States v. Skrmetti No edit summary

05:4905:49, 20 June 2025 diff hist −762 United States v. Skrmetti Deleted citations to biased and unreliable sources together with some tea leaf reading that is no longer relevant anyway now that the case has been decided.
05:2505:25, 20 June 2025 diff hist −260 United States v. Skrmetti Deleted claim that did not seem to make much sense. Referenced source was unreliable and did not seem to support claim
05:2005:20, 20 June 2025 diff hist −241 United States v. Skrmetti Removed citations to biased sources.
05:1505:15, 20 June 2025 diff hist −5 United States v. Skrmetti No edit summary

15:3215:32, 18 June 2025 diff hist −2,972 United States v. Skrmetti Deleted section on prognostication now that the decision has been issued. Analysis about the case’s impact should now include the decision itself. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit App section source
15:3015:30, 18 June 2025 diff hist −1 m United States v. Skrmetti Fixed typo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit App section source
14:2814:28, 18 June 2025 diff hist +3 m United States v. Skrmetti Citation to Supreme Court added Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit App section source
14:2514:25, 18 June 2025 diff hist −200 United States v. Skrmetti Updated to include holding. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit App section source
11:5611:56, 18 June 2025 diff hist −310 United States v. Skrmetti Removed a reference to salon.com as a source. Salon is not a reliable source for Supreme Court analysis. Tags: Manual revert Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit App section source

03:4803:48, 2 June 2025 diff hist +394 Tupolev Tu-22M →Invasion of Ukraine

20:5320:53, 13 May 2025 diff hist +3 United States v. Skrmetti Revised language about the challenged law to more precisely reflect the content of the law. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit App section source
20:4920:49, 13 May 2025 diff hist +39 United States v. Skrmetti clarified effect of bills on participation in sports Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit App section source
17:1717:17, 13 May 2025 diff hist +12 Talk:United States v. Skrmetti minor clarification Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit App talk source
01:2201:22, 13 May 2025 diff hist +122 Talk:United States v. Skrmetti Added suggested edit. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit App talk source
01:1301:13, 13 May 2025 diff hist +564 Talk:United States v. Skrmetti →Language dispute: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit App talk reply
01:0701:07, 13 May 2025 diff hist +971 Talk:United States v. Skrmetti →Language dispute: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit App talk reply

11:2111:21, 12 May 2025 diff hist +681 Talk:United States v. Skrmetti →Language dispute: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit App talk reply
10:3810:38, 12 May 2025 diff hist −182 Mesa, Arizona Undid revision 1289991103 by Pinkbeast (talk) The references are outdated because at 11 and 8 years old, respectively, they have lost the salience necessary for the introduction. The same information is still elsewhere in the article. Tags: Undo Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit App undo

14:4514:45, 30 April 2025 diff hist −4 United States v. Skrmetti Deleted a reference to “every major medical association” and replaced with reference to “major medical associations”. The cited source refers to only two medical associations. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit App section source
14:4214:42, 30 April 2025 diff hist −333 United States v. Skrmetti Deleted sentence because it contains loaded language and does not add to an understanding of the legal case. “Evangelicals” are not a party to the case, and so a reference to them is irrelevant. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit App full source

16:1816:18, 20 April 2025 diff hist +171 Talk:English exonyms added to my own comment current Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit App talk source
16:1116:11, 20 April 2025 diff hist +399 Talk:English exonyms →Bolivia: new section Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit App talk topic

17:2017:20, 3 February 2025 diff hist +2,396 User talk:QuicoleJR →Closure of "Should we mention in the lead the 'increased anti-Chinese racism.'" on COVID-19 lab leak theory page: new section Tags: Reverted New topic

19:3819:38, 10 January 2025 diff hist +451 Talk:COVID-19 lab leak theory →Should we mention in the lead the "increased anti-Chinese racism.": Reply Tag: Reply
02:1402:14, 10 January 2025 diff hist +1,031 Talk:COVID-19 lab leak theory →Should we mention in the lead the "increased anti-Chinese racism.": Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit App talk reply
01:4401:44, 10 January 2025 diff hist +401 Talk:COVID-19 lab leak theory →Should we mention in the lead the "increased anti-Chinese racism.": Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit App talk reply
00:0900:09, 10 January 2025 diff hist +636 Talk:COVID-19 lab leak theory →Should we mention in the lead the "increased anti-Chinese racism.": Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit App talk reply

20:2220:22, 9 January 2025 diff hist +1,113 Talk:COVID-19 lab leak theory →Should we mention in the lead the "increased anti-Chinese racism.": Reply Tag: Reply
19:5519:55, 9 January 2025 diff hist +1,918 Talk:COVID-19 lab leak theory →Should we mention in the lead the "increased anti-Chinese racism.": Reply Tag: Reply
16:1516:15, 9 January 2025 diff hist +391 Yacuiba No edit summary
16:0316:03, 9 January 2025 diff hist +5 m Yacuiba Fixed link to football team
15:5915:59, 9 January 2025 diff hist +3,549 Talk:COVID-19 lab leak theory →Should we mention in the lead the "increased anti-Chinese racism.": Reply Tag: Reply
15:3615:36, 9 January 2025 diff hist +711 Talk:COVID-19 lab leak theory →Should we mention in the lead the "increased anti-Chinese racism.": Reply Tag: Reply
15:3015:30, 9 January 2025 diff hist +7,074 Talk:COVID-19 lab leak theory →Should we mention in the lead the "increased anti-Chinese racism.": Reply Tag: Reply

21:4321:43, 6 January 2025 diff hist −6,026 User talk:Dustinscottc →Note to Self current Tag: Manual revert
21:4021:40, 6 January 2025 diff hist +6,072 N User:Dustinscottc/sandbox ←Created page with '{{User sandbox}}  == Note to Self == None of the sources provided by Shibbolethink support the disputed claim because the source does not claim that the lab leak theory caused an increase in anti-Chinese or anti-Asian racism or because the source is not reliable for the claim being made (or both). Further, some sources have already been thoroughly discussed here before, and one source was included twice. I kindly request that...' current
21:1221:12, 6 January 2025 diff hist +166 User talk:Dustinscottc →Note to Self Tag: Reverted
21:1021:10, 6 January 2025 diff hist +221 User talk:Dustinscottc →Note to Self Tag: Reverted
20:5420:54, 6 January 2025 diff hist −1 User talk:Dustinscottc →Note to Self Tag: Reverted
20:5320:53, 6 January 2025 diff hist +5,640 User talk:Dustinscottc →Note to Self: new section Tags: Reverted New topic

19:0019:00, 3 January 2025 diff hist −786 Mesa, Arizona Deleted a reference to Mesa being the most conservative city in the United States because the references are now outdated. Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit App section source

14:2014:20, 2 January 2025 diff hist −109 User talk:Dustinscottc No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit App talk source
14:1714:17, 2 January 2025 diff hist +318 User talk:Dustinscottc →Introduction to contentious topics: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit App talk reply
06:1706:17, 2 January 2025 diff hist +304 User talk:Dustinscottc block appeal Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit App talk source
06:0006:00, 2 January 2025 diff hist +483 Talk:Mesa, Arizona →“Most conservative city” designation: new section current Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit App talk topic

23 July 2025

7 July 2025

2 July 2025

1 July 2025

20 June 2025

18 June 2025

2 June 2025

13 May 2025

12 May 2025

30 April 2025

20 April 2025

3 February 2025

10 January 2025

9 January 2025

6 January 2025

3 January 2025

2 January 2025