User contributions for Dustinscottc

Search for contributionsshowhide

⧼contribs-top⧽

Username, IP address or CIDR range:

Namespace:

Invert selection

Associated namespace

Tag filter:

Invert selection

Only show edits that are latest revisions

Only show edits that are page creations

Hide minor edits

⧼contribs-date⧽

From date:

To date:

Show only edits pending review

Hide probably good edits

11:2111:21, 12 May 2025 diff hist +681 Talk:United States v. Skrmetti →Language dispute: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit App talk reply
10:3810:38, 12 May 2025 diff hist −182 Mesa, Arizona Undid revision 1289991103 by Pinkbeast (talk) The references are outdated because at 11 and 8 years old, respectively, they have lost the salience necessary for the introduction. The same information is still elsewhere in the article. current Tags: Undo Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit App undo

14:4514:45, 30 April 2025 diff hist −4 United States v. Skrmetti Deleted a reference to “every major medical association” and replaced with reference to “major medical associations”. The cited source refers to only two medical associations. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit App section source
14:4214:42, 30 April 2025 diff hist −333 United States v. Skrmetti Deleted sentence because it contains loaded language and does not add to an understanding of the legal case. “Evangelicals” are not a party to the case, and so a reference to them is irrelevant. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit App full source

16:1816:18, 20 April 2025 diff hist +171 Talk:English exonyms added to my own comment current Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit App talk source
16:1116:11, 20 April 2025 diff hist +399 Talk:English exonyms →Bolivia: new section Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit App talk topic

17:2017:20, 3 February 2025 diff hist +2,396 User talk:QuicoleJR →Closure of "Should we mention in the lead the 'increased anti-Chinese racism.'" on COVID-19 lab leak theory page: new section Tags: Reverted New topic

19:3819:38, 10 January 2025 diff hist +451 Talk:COVID-19 lab leak theory →Should we mention in the lead the "increased anti-Chinese racism.": Reply Tag: Reply
02:1402:14, 10 January 2025 diff hist +1,031 Talk:COVID-19 lab leak theory →Should we mention in the lead the "increased anti-Chinese racism.": Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit App talk reply
01:4401:44, 10 January 2025 diff hist +401 Talk:COVID-19 lab leak theory →Should we mention in the lead the "increased anti-Chinese racism.": Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit App talk reply
00:0900:09, 10 January 2025 diff hist +636 Talk:COVID-19 lab leak theory →Should we mention in the lead the "increased anti-Chinese racism.": Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit App talk reply

20:2220:22, 9 January 2025 diff hist +1,113 Talk:COVID-19 lab leak theory →Should we mention in the lead the "increased anti-Chinese racism.": Reply Tag: Reply
19:5519:55, 9 January 2025 diff hist +1,918 Talk:COVID-19 lab leak theory →Should we mention in the lead the "increased anti-Chinese racism.": Reply Tag: Reply
16:1516:15, 9 January 2025 diff hist +391 Yacuiba No edit summary current
16:0316:03, 9 January 2025 diff hist +5 m Yacuiba Fixed link to football team
15:5915:59, 9 January 2025 diff hist +3,549 Talk:COVID-19 lab leak theory →Should we mention in the lead the "increased anti-Chinese racism.": Reply Tag: Reply
15:3615:36, 9 January 2025 diff hist +711 Talk:COVID-19 lab leak theory →Should we mention in the lead the "increased anti-Chinese racism.": Reply Tag: Reply
15:3015:30, 9 January 2025 diff hist +7,074 Talk:COVID-19 lab leak theory →Should we mention in the lead the "increased anti-Chinese racism.": Reply Tag: Reply

21:4321:43, 6 January 2025 diff hist −6,026 User talk:Dustinscottc →Note to Self current Tag: Manual revert
21:4021:40, 6 January 2025 diff hist +6,072 N User:Dustinscottc/sandbox ←Created page with '{{User sandbox}}  == Note to Self == None of the sources provided by Shibbolethink support the disputed claim because the source does not claim that the lab leak theory caused an increase in anti-Chinese or anti-Asian racism or because the source is not reliable for the claim being made (or both). Further, some sources have already been thoroughly discussed here before, and one source was included twice. I kindly request that...' current
21:1221:12, 6 January 2025 diff hist +166 User talk:Dustinscottc →Note to Self Tag: Reverted
21:1021:10, 6 January 2025 diff hist +221 User talk:Dustinscottc →Note to Self Tag: Reverted
20:5420:54, 6 January 2025 diff hist −1 User talk:Dustinscottc →Note to Self Tag: Reverted
20:5320:53, 6 January 2025 diff hist +5,640 User talk:Dustinscottc →Note to Self: new section Tags: Reverted New topic

19:0019:00, 3 January 2025 diff hist −786 Mesa, Arizona Deleted a reference to Mesa being the most conservative city in the United States because the references are now outdated. Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit App section source

14:2014:20, 2 January 2025 diff hist −109 User talk:Dustinscottc No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit App talk source
14:1714:17, 2 January 2025 diff hist +318 User talk:Dustinscottc →Introduction to contentious topics: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit App talk reply
06:1706:17, 2 January 2025 diff hist +304 User talk:Dustinscottc block appeal Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit App talk source
06:0006:00, 2 January 2025 diff hist +483 Talk:Mesa, Arizona →“Most conservative city” designation: new section current Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit App talk topic
05:2205:22, 2 January 2025 diff hist +200 User talk:Dustinscottc →Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit App talk reply
05:2105:21, 2 January 2025 diff hist +481 User talk:Dustinscottc →Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit App talk reply
05:1005:10, 2 January 2025 diff hist +122 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring →User:Dustinscottc reported by User:Newimpartial (Result: Declined): Reply Tag: Reply
04:5204:52, 2 January 2025 diff hist +133 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring →User:Dustinscottc reported by User:Newimpartial (Result: ): Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
04:5004:50, 2 January 2025 diff hist +65 N User:Dustinscottc ←Created page with 'Occasional editor, typically to address errors in existing pages.' current Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
04:4604:46, 2 January 2025 diff hist +190 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring →User:Dustinscottc reported by User:Newimpartial (Result: ): Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
04:4104:41, 2 January 2025 diff hist +502 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring →User:Dustinscottc reported by User:Newimpartial (Result: ): Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
04:2904:29, 2 January 2025 diff hist +181 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring →User:Dustinscottc reported by User:Newimpartial (Result: ): Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
04:2204:22, 2 January 2025 diff hist +189 User talk:Newimpartial →Please stop adding the SPA tag: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit App talk reply
04:1904:19, 2 January 2025 diff hist +302 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring →User:Dustinscottc reported by User:Newimpartial (Result: ): Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
03:5103:51, 2 January 2025 diff hist +411 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring →User:Dustinscottc reported by User:Newimpartial (Result: ): Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
03:0703:07, 2 January 2025 diff hist +694 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring →User:Dustinscottc reported by User:Newimpartial (Result: ): Reply Tag: Reply
02:2002:20, 2 January 2025 diff hist +116 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring Added sentence to my own response. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
02:1802:18, 2 January 2025 diff hist +355 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring →User:Dustinscottc reported by User:Newimpartial (Result: ): Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
01:0301:03, 2 January 2025 diff hist +867 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring →User:Dustinscottc reported by User:Newimpartial (Result: ): Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
00:4600:46, 2 January 2025 diff hist +235 User talk:Newimpartial →Please stop adding the SPA tag: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit App talk reply

22:1422:14, 1 January 2025 diff hist +341 User talk:Newimpartial →Please stop adding the SPA tag: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit App talk reply
22:0522:05, 1 January 2025 diff hist −3,248 Talk:COVID-19 lab leak theory Undid revision 1266709188 by Newimpartial (talk) No, it is not. SPA does not clearly apply to talk pages at all. Even if it does, the guidelines I cited earlier do not support the tag. Tags: Undo Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit App undo
21:5821:58, 1 January 2025 diff hist +214 User talk:Newimpartial →Please stop adding the SPA tag: new section Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit App talk topic
21:5621:56, 1 January 2025 diff hist −3,248 Talk:COVID-19 lab leak theory Undid revision 1266707280 by Newimpartial (talk) Please stop adding this tag. I have not edited a single article related to LL. My "edits" have all been contributions to the talk page to resolve a single issue. That's not SPA in the first place. Tags: Undo Reverted Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit App undo
21:3721:37, 1 January 2025 diff hist −3,248 Talk:COVID-19 lab leak theory →Should we mention in the lead the "increased anti-Chinese racism.": Per WP:SPATAG “Examples of users whose edits should not be labeled as being those of an SPA include the following: Users with a diversified edit history that indicates that the user became inactive for an extended period and then later re-established themselves with single-subject edits.” and “Number of edits: A user should not be tagged as an SPA just because they only have a handful of edits. While all users with just... Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit

12 May 2025

30 April 2025

20 April 2025

3 February 2025

10 January 2025

9 January 2025

6 January 2025

3 January 2025

2 January 2025

1 January 2025