User contributions for Dcokeman

30 July 2005

• 04:2604:26, 30 July 2005 diff hist +2,345 George W. Bush appalling that statistics can be added without a citation; I guess I am an old fan of balanced means presenting both sides equally (try to equate it numerically). Just the facts!
• 04:0704:07, 30 July 2005 diff hist −64 George W. Bush keep extra Bush military record, then keep extra info about academics. hey, both are about 2004 election on another page. Fair and balanced.
• 03:5103:51, 30 July 2005 diff hist +1,657 Talk:George W. Bush →Fahrenheit/FahrenHYPE: NPOV in text, wikilinks, ext links
• 03:3203:32, 30 July 2005 diff hist −217 George W. Bush hey, all this extra 2004 info is on another page. since many don't want to rehash, leave it there OR BALANCE it!

13 July 2005

• 23:1223:12, 13 July 2005 diff hist −8 George W. Bush Blu, thanks for correction. I was just trying to find a middle ground.
• 23:0923:09, 13 July 2005 diff hist +4,084 Talk:George W. Bush Just the facts, just the facts. No one can give info into importance of Heit to Bush or the American people. Even misused source
• 22:5122:51, 13 July 2005 diff hist +31 George W. Bush Included Hype: hey, just a link. Call for people to examine External Link to open section on Bush criticism and detractors or weave some in. Need balance
• 22:4622:46, 13 July 2005 diff hist +1,628 Talk:George W. Bush Heit/Hype: This also calls for the need to balance the external links. Hype is just a link that provides a good amount of info about Bush's administration
• 22:3622:36, 13 July 2005 diff hist +1,534 Talk:George W. Bush I'll stop defining when people stop telling me I don't know what words mean and they're absolutely wrong.
• 15:4715:47, 13 July 2005 diff hist +5,724 m Talk:George W. Bush need impartiality, and freedom from self-interest or favoritism
• 14:2814:28, 13 July 2005 diff hist +892 Talk:George W. Bush Pioneer-12 is radical and must be suppressed: he wants balance, fairness, and facts. The American way has no place in our need for editorials passed off as fact.
• 14:1514:15, 13 July 2005 diff hist 0 m Talk:George W. Bush No edit summary
• 14:1114:11, 13 July 2005 diff hist +3,871 Talk:George W. Bush let's give both links and let the reader decide what is or isn't factual. Ruthless adherence to fact. Still, why present political commentaries?
• 06:0306:03, 13 July 2005 diff hist +5 m Talk:George W. Bush No edit summary
• 05:5505:55, 13 July 2005 diff hist +1,647 Talk:George W. Bush Mrs. Freisling and I are two peas in a pod, riding along in agreement.
• 05:0705:07, 13 July 2005 diff hist +1,280 Talk:George W. Bush move on
• 04:3904:39, 13 July 2005 diff hist +1,100 Talk:George W. Bush Move on: Fahrenheit/hype is too minor of an issue. Put both down and let's move on.
• 03:5103:51, 13 July 2005 diff hist +1,349 Talk:George W. Bush ok, ok: balance it out then. Ms. Freisling thinks this issue can easily be resolved.
• 02:0902:09, 13 July 2005 diff hist +1,989 Talk:George W. Bush Calling all facts: be on the look out for facts supporting POV. It looks like . . . .
• 01:4601:46, 13 July 2005 diff hist +705 Talk:George W. Bush well, quibbling over minor points; Wiki wants balanced and factual. It is factual to include both. Balanced? Yes.
• 01:3501:35, 13 July 2005 diff hist +1,399 Talk:George W. Bush what role in the life of Bush and the presidency? it is a film: please give hard data showing how this affected Bush
• 01:1401:14, 13 July 2005 diff hist −1 Talk:George W. Bush "About informing the reader," says Mr. Freisling. Then inform the reader (by giving Hype and Heit).
• 01:1201:12, 13 July 2005 diff hist +1,443 Talk:George W. Bush "About informing the reader," says Mr. Freisling. Then inform the reader (by giving Hype and Heit).
• 01:1101:11, 13 July 2005 diff hist +21 George W. Bush I just want to inform the reader. What are we so afraid of? The reader might look at both and realize a controversy. God forbid
• 00:5400:54, 13 July 2005 diff hist +605 Talk:George W. Bush Ann Coulter is noteworthy and relevant. Let's add her too!
• 00:5200:52, 13 July 2005 diff hist +67 George W. Bush added very noteworthy and relevant source. That's the standard. Parroting because your statements also hold true for Hype!
• 00:4100:41, 13 July 2005 diff hist +21 George W. Bush a criticism does not have to be neutral to be noteworthy. Hype is/was. Added great site for See Also.
• 00:3900:39, 13 July 2005 diff hist +867 Talk:George W. Bush too make Heit/Hype more balanced, let's only talk about one . . . did I miss something here?
• 00:2500:25, 13 July 2005 diff hist +1,674 Talk:George W. Bush job market and population
• 00:2500:25, 13 July 2005 diff hist −21 George W. Bush this is not place for POV re:9/11. Moore's film is not neutral (neither is hype). Moved both links to be fair.
• 00:0900:09, 13 July 2005 diff hist +17 George W. Bush Fahrnenhype is logical; it doesn't hurt anything and is as NPOV as Moore's film. Both are worth seeing (presumably, but equally?).
• 00:0000:00, 13 July 2005 diff hist +1,958 Talk:George W. Bush Farenhype or heit . . . for balance, throw in both and forget or realize both are political and forget? .

12 July 2005

• 23:4323:43, 12 July 2005 diff hist +547 Talk:George W. Bush Kerry's grades aren't mentioned, but by all means change to directly talk about Bush's grades.
• 23:3723:37, 12 July 2005 diff hist +3 m George W. Bush Think indifferent is what is needed in place of neutral; see Talk page about Farhenheit 911 / Farenhype 911.
• 23:3523:35, 12 July 2005 diff hist +336 Talk:George W. Bush Science does merit clarifications; let me know about word change in article, listed here.
• 16:3216:32, 12 July 2005 diff hist +1,404 Talk:George W. Bush this is about Bush's qualifications: this was a major 2004 issue tied to guard service
• 16:1416:14, 12 July 2005 diff hist +1,406 Talk:George W. Bush you said it: I want to balance the background and qualifications piece!